9/11 can/should/ought to be seen as the final destination of a bullet the US fired first. Such a bullet circled the earth and humanity many times creating havoc all over the place, destroying local forms of governance, pillaging natural resources, setting up puppet regimes, forcing "free" trade agreements so that all conceivable goods have to be shipped to the US, etc.
At the end, such bloody bullet came full circle and hit the neck of the sniper (i.e., the US), thus proving right an old medieval saying: "Every murder is a suicide."
2006-12-25 02:55:14
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
3⤋
The answer is NO...
Did the 186 Russian children killed in 9/01/04 Beslan School Massacre deserve to die?
I mean, the Russians sell billions of dollars in military equipment to armies all over the world, far more than what the US has sold to his allies in Europe, Asia and the Middle East; they destroyed entire villages in Afghanistan in the 1970s and murdered hundreds of thousands of people in Eastern Europe during the Cold War. THe Russians also propped up the government in Eastern Germany, who tortured and executed thousands of East Germans during the 1950s, 60s and built a wall that shackled Eastern Germany since the 1950s.
And what about the Chinese? Did the 2,600 students that died in the Tianamen Square Massacre in 1989 deserve to die? Most of these young student pro-democracy activists are languishing in prisons in Manchuria or have fled to Europe and the US for their anti-communist views and some were even killed for voicing their discontent against the Beijing's reppresive government and yet, we buy millions of dollars in consumer goods made in China, most probably made under slave labor.
And what about North Korea? How many innocent people have had to flee into exile and live on the run because of Pyonyang's repressive government? How many Japanese civilians have been kidnapped by North Korean agents and forced to train North Korean spies on their own culture under fear of torture and execution?
What about the Spaniards that were killed in the 3/11/04 train bombings of Madrid? The British citizens that were killed in the 7/07/05 bus bombings in London? The Jordanians that were killed in the 11/09/05 hotel bombings in Amman and the Indonesians that were killed in the 10/12/02 resort bombings in Bali?
You thump your chest denouncing the US government as a BOMBER NATION and yet you ignore these facts.
The truth might be patriotic, but your truth is seditious at best.
I am done here.
2006-12-25 03:18:32
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
NO, absolutely not. The death of innocent lives. always in the wrong. Live and let live, do not bomb and do not be bombed. The government has an obligation to protect the country, and with the obligation should be absolute precaution to prevent civilian death that is not warrented. Our country should serve as a model for evolved human compassion and reason, as we have the most military power. If we abuse this, there could be problems. It is an absolute horror what happened on 9/11 and from this we should learn.
2006-12-26 07:51:20
·
answer #3
·
answered by EM-water2 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
I'm quite a student of history and have fought in the Second World War every inch of the way across Europe. When I read ignorant statements it gets my heat up.
First of all, where and when did America do all this bombing that your statement claims ? I know of no bombing of anything outside of a declaired war.
Deaths in a declaired war are unfortunate, but people know the danger and can take shelter, however flimsy. We expect to be bombed in a declaired war - - - that's what war is.
The bombing of the Towers was not war, it was murder. No nation declaired war on us before the bombing.
The Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor was another example of murder. There was no declairation of war as required by international law.
Any nation in a legal war, legal according to international law, is expected to use whatever it has to do as much damage as possible to bring the war to an end.
You seem to think that we should volunteer to be targets for whoever cares to kill us. We shouldn't harm them, after all they don't have to weapons that we have, so we should be targets.
What in hell do you mean we act innocent when we get bombed ? What were we guilty of at 9/11 ? We were not at war with any of the Arab nations. what were we guilty of ?
Our B-17"s, 29's, or 52's have blown away no one that we were not in a declaired war with.
Wise up, People around the world bash America because we are the only country they all depend on to try to keep this lousy world together. I don't mind foreign bashers, but guys like you- - - never mind.
2006-12-25 03:15:35
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
No, the United States did NOT deserve the attacks on 9/11!
You sound like your a self righteous, left wing lunatic without a clue. How about getting some experience and education before making these broad, incoherent statements?
I've been on multiple combat deployments and I did everything possible not to hurt non-combatives and any time U.S Service members have violated the rules of land combat, the guilty have been prosecuted.
2006-12-25 05:05:02
·
answer #5
·
answered by Jim 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
In my humble opinion you sound very backward in your thinking. On one hand you are saying that the victims did not deserve to die that day, and you are 100% right but on the other hand you say that America has a track record of bombing. You are probably a person who agrees on everything so you don't to have to argue. Very passive/agressive.
Well let me ask you did America ever (for no reason ) engage the bombing of non military people during non war time and non military targets ? Well the filthy animals from the mid east did.
I select all of my email then delete -- I don't read messages from other members]
2006-12-25 03:12:10
·
answer #6
·
answered by caciansf 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
Your theory is ludicrous.No one deserved what happened on that tragic day,and the cowards that committed the act decided to perish with them,but that is no consolation to all the hurt and pain they caused.
There are still people out there maybe still in the USA who feel the same way,probably you also. I hope that those who feel this was justified will be brought to their own justice by the United States or other means.
i still have memories of all those people in the Middle East laughing joyously over the news that the United States was attacked in the greatest city of the world,New York.
I hope that whoever was glad that this event happened rots in hell.
2006-12-25 02:48:28
·
answer #7
·
answered by Dfirefox 6
·
3⤊
0⤋
Yes, because we try to kill innocent civilians. That's why we can't bomb AA guns in Iraq because they are on top of civilian housing. THat's why we can't bomb towns into oblivion, that's why we spend so much money on smart weapons. Because we like to see kids holding candy light up like the 4th of July. Seriously, you need to go back to Camp Retard because this is one of the dumbest questions I have ever heard. Yes, in Germany we did bomb people to snot, but that's because that's what we had at the time. Trust me, if we wanted to, we could turn Iraq into a sheet of glass by just bombing everyone. You can buy a whole lot of dumb bombs for the cost of one smart bomb, but with a smart bomb, you blow the living room apart while preserving the kitchen.
Think before you act stupid.
2006-12-25 03:05:28
·
answer #8
·
answered by Brian I 3
·
4⤊
0⤋
Nope, the innocent people who died that day had nothing to do with the issues the supposed "holy warriors" had with us. If they were true warriors, they would have come after the military, like men, but they are *******. The Japanese were the only other ones to blindside the US, but at least they had the stones to go after the military. And you didn't see the japanese dancing in the streets as the towers fell, these "holy warriors" are the lowest form of life on the planet.
2016-05-23 05:41:43
·
answer #9
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well heres a reason no one would like, the religious people of this country should have tried long ago to evangelize the Muslims, but since we sit and enjoy America and let the Muslims continue to terrorize each other, instead of bringing Christianity to them, God brought them to us, so now we have to go to them via the Military. Not all men in the military are nonchristians and the christian faith is now spreading more in the middle east then it did before, thanks to the troops that are christian and other religious figures that are over there in the conflict.
2006-12-25 05:44:16
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋