2006-12-25 01:55:01 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Yes. It is called self-religion. You belong to NO group. You listen to NO speakers. You read NO literature. You believe on God, but do not tell others about your beliefs. And you live your life as you would want others to live their lives; in peace, and minding your own business.
Unfortunately RELIGIONS depend upon MONEY to survive. So they keep looking for volunteers to ask for more money, more money.
2006-12-25 02:03:27 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
What's wrong with condemning something that's incorrect? You're not condemning the people that subscribe to that belief. Scientific strides are made by condemning what is incorrect, tearing down false ideas.
The idea that we should "condemn" other religions is based off of this PC world where "we don't want to hurt anyone's feelings" rather than "What is correct?" There can only be one truth. TRUE free thinkers, and those with an open mind understand this very rational fact. Others? Their mind is so open, their brain is falling out.
Let the thumb downs begin.
2006-12-25 02:11:18 · answer #2 · answered by raVar 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Ooo, somebody beat me to it but basically not even christianity is so unified that you could say that Christians condemn Islam (though I do hear quite a number of individuals condemn Buddhism as idol worship - but that's benighted individuals doing that, not a religion). Maybe a better question would be which religions do not have adherants who believe that salvation or enlightenment depends on membership or faith (or even which religions teach that). Really, most religions outside Christianity and Islam allow that your salvation is your problem, and that non-believers are just the same as anybody else, don't they?
2006-12-25 02:19:43 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes, but they are not monotheistic in nature. The religions that believe that there is only one God also believe that there is only one way to worship that one God. If you so not follow that way then you are wrong.
There may be people within any given religion that are tolerant of people of other religions, but the religious doctrine that the religion is based on is not tolerant of other religions, especially those that promote a different god, or gods.
2006-12-25 02:15:30 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Buddhism is not a Religion but condems all Ignorance.
Religion is a by product of Ignorance.
All religions are dogma!
2006-12-25 02:45:53 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Sure is but you just have to look hard. Condemning another religion and telling the truth as is in history as to what they have done are two totally different things. You can tell the truth and yet still not condemn another church.
2006-12-25 02:00:47 · answer #6 · answered by ramall1to 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Judaism.
Jews don't try to convert anyone as do Christians and Muslims.
As long as you follow the 7 Noahide Laws, you will get to wherever the Jews get to without the 613 Commandments that Jews are required to obey. I'm OK and so are you OK according to Judaism.
Most State Constitutions are based on these Laws.
Look up Noahide Laws.
2006-12-25 02:02:54 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Any Dharmic religion. Hinduism, Buddhism, Sihkism, Jainism.
2006-12-25 01:58:15 · answer #8 · answered by some teenager 5 · 5⤊ 1⤋
Buddhism and Taoism (but Taoism is often not refereed as a religion.)
Gnostic's had/have the idea that your own intuitive knowledge of the mystery is the thing so they are not into condemning,but as its an early christian sect or even pre-christian its hard to say-.
check the link.
2006-12-25 02:03:10 · answer #9 · answered by idiotjim 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I think there are people of all religions that do not condemn other people for their religions.
2006-12-25 02:01:27 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋