Ok, you people stupid. The asker means how did they have kids when Adam and Eve's kids were both male? DUH!
2006-12-24 17:35:08
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
3⤋
As one poster already said: you are only the 20 Billionth person to ask this question.
The store of adam and Eve are a parable and borrowed from Babylonian and Sumerian Myths.. It is possible that they represent a group of people not just two individuals.
Even if it was about Allah revealing himself to Adam, it is still a parable about the first man to submit to Allah. Thus making Adam the first Muslim.
Adam and Even were not the first humans. Most likely they were from some tribe in the Middle East, probably Sumerian related.
2006-12-25 03:28:28
·
answer #2
·
answered by TLE_MGR 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
They sure did. And at this time there was nothing wrong with it either. Remember that Adam and Eve lived very long lives. Almost but not quite 1000 years.
A lot of babies were born to them and their children. In a 1000 years there could be millions of people born. Consider this the next time you read the Bible.><>
2006-12-25 01:28:13
·
answer #3
·
answered by CEM 5
·
3⤊
1⤋
Since Adam and EVE were the first of the race we call Israelites. And lived in the Garden of Eden. away from the rest of the world. Adam an Eve had the first Children the usual way two sets of fraternal twins and one male . After that they married each other . until they sinned and were evicted from the GARDEN of EDEN and met other tribes on the outside.and married into those tribes.
2006-12-25 01:35:22
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Well, you have to go back and read Genesis. Cain after Abel death left Eden to other lands and got married. The book appears to be full of contradictions, but the truth of the matter is that it's been grossly miss understood and miss interpreted. The first thing to keep in mind is that you are not reading a book of history when you read the Bible. Read Genesis 4. 15-16-17.
2006-12-25 01:47:31
·
answer #5
·
answered by Simon 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
Cain slew Abel. Cain went to Nod, where he found a wife. At the time of this scripture, there was no other record of Adam and
Eve ever having any other children.
Obviously, if God created Adam and Eve, they were nit the first people and /or He did not stop there.
Get your head out of that book.
2006-12-25 01:37:06
·
answer #6
·
answered by Gorgeoustxwoman2013 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
(Genesis 5:4) . . .And the days of Adam after his fathering Seth came to be eight hundred years. Meanwhile he became father to sons and daughters. . .
Since they didn't have all the imperfections we humans have today intercourse within siblings was not a problem. It wasn't until centuries later that God gave the command (Leviticus 18:9) Â “‘As for the nakedness of your sister, the daughter of your father or the daughter of your mother, whether born in the same household or born outside it, you must not lay bare their nakedness. Imperfection had now rooted into humanity making relations between siblings or relates a sin.
2006-12-25 01:58:02
·
answer #7
·
answered by Liz R 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I would imagine they had them the same way their parents did. They "knew" each other (to use the biblical euphemism). Which of course is incest, since the bible doesn't say there were any other people around, unless they skipped that part. So I guess we are all the products of incest on a massive scale; it does explain a lot of things.
2006-12-25 01:27:18
·
answer #8
·
answered by weary0918 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
Probably not, and it wouldn't make sense at all... its not like Adam was going to cheat on Eve with a monkey! She was all f*ck that was available at that time!
2006-12-25 01:47:59
·
answer #9
·
answered by Max D 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
there was not a priest around at that time so they lived in sin ,
any way the story of Adam was not real ,it was a symbolic story of a whole slave race that was created by the Anunaki .to mine gold for them ,
they made up this story to satisfy the curiosity of the slaves
the snake was the symbolic representation of the Anunaki
2006-12-25 01:29:44
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
the command against incest wasn't given at that point in time and neither were there the same inhibitions about that. God forbids things that are harmful to us and at that time the genepool was still pretty much perfect and there were not the same dangers of inbreeding that exists today.
2006-12-25 01:27:22
·
answer #11
·
answered by Captain America 5
·
3⤊
1⤋