How are communities supposed to be sustainable?

Question

Forests clean the air and water and provide emotional calmness to the landscape.

In suburban communities, forests are being cleared for construction of malls, dealerships, and housing developments.

How is nature supposed to stay sustainable when all the forsent ecosystems are being disturbed and more pavement hits the ground? How much forestly is enough to keep it balanced?

Answer 1

mrwiz, how do you expect food to be grown, if everyone is living on that a 2 foot square area?? that doesn't even make sense to present that in support of an argument suggesting their is still plenty of room!
do you realize how much space is required to raise just one cow for milk?
how about another for beef?
how about land for just one house?
if you figure that up realitisticlaly, you are looking at
at least 1 acre per dairy cow
at least 1 acre per beef cow
and at least 1 acre per home
that is already up to 3 acres per person, now figure that into your math problem.
after you do that, realize that isn't even considering how much space is needed to grow fruit and veggies.
that doesn't even figure in, the amount of acres of plants we need to consume the CO2, that is generated per human, for the products and services we consume that generate it.

to answer your question, it isn't!
the oceans are dying off, and so are trees and other plants as a result of the imabalances we have caused.

Answer 2

yes , overpopulation can cause mucho issues and problems, however, unless you're willing to start "knocking back" the population there is not a lot we can do.

Dont sweat it, there is still plenty of room, if everyone were to stand in a 2' by 2' square, all of the people in the usa would fit in 42 square miles.

300,000,000 million people x 2' * 2' /44,000 sq. ft per acre/ 640 acres in square mile

My state South Carolina has 30,000 square miles and 39 states are larger than us. Dont believe everything the media says about development- if we do it smart, we can tolerate much more growth for the next several hundred years.

Answer 3

i understand my place is politically incorrect, yet i think it particularly is the proverbial "Elephant in the room". i think the source of the themes suggested in the question are rooted in a international human inhabitants that a procedures exceeds the skill of the earth to assist. The cultures that lived in the technique of the atmosphere had populations that self regulated to stay nicely below the barriers of their atmosphere to assist them. at present, we've synthetic systems, which includes low fee capability, which artifically inflate the skill of the atmosphere to assist human inhabitants explosion. If that capability have been faraway from the atmosphere, the present human inhabitants would give way to a lots decrease point over a very short quantity of time. are you able to think of the chaos that should create in our worldwide? different synthetic systems we've put in place are reliance on technologies to save us, and willingness to pollute and abuse our earth. As we attain the barriers of sustainability, further and extra combating over limited materials ensues. it is the shift from survival to capability that has taken place. in the long-term, i think that there will be a organic reversion of the human inhabitants to a miles extra sustainable point. Social systems will emerge very resembling the tribal and nomadic systems of early mankind. if it particularly is the case, the getting from right here to there in basic terms isn't exceptionally.

Answer 4

dont worry it will all be over soon breath deep and often.