One prevents life from forming, the other takes a life after it has formed.
2006-12-24 15:33:03
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
the condom is put on in an attempt to prevent the egg from being fertilized, the abortion takes place once the baby is already starting to develop in the mother's womb.
2006-12-24 23:32:46
·
answer #2
·
answered by Richard H 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
The Catholics don't approve of either one of these things. Protestants say it's okay to prevent the pregnancy from happening - but not okay to END the pregnancy. And pro-choice people say it's okay to do whatever the heck you want to do - because it's your body. I'm guessing that's what you wanted to know because this is in the Religion and Spirituality section.
2006-12-25 00:23:06
·
answer #3
·
answered by liddabet 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Responsibility.
2006-12-24 23:32:02
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
about $500
2006-12-24 23:33:14
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
By your rational there is no difference between not having sex and an abortion.
2006-12-24 23:39:05
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Same as the difference between murder and personal responsibility.
2006-12-24 23:40:46
·
answer #7
·
answered by girlinks 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
A fertilized egg does not implant on the uterine wall.
Thus, the mother never nurtures it.
.
2006-12-24 23:47:35
·
answer #8
·
answered by Jimmy Dean 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
The difference is: One who thinks ahead of time.
2006-12-24 23:32:01
·
answer #9
·
answered by Sunflower 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Very little. In abortion, there is a life, in a condom, there might have been a life.
2006-12-24 23:33:33
·
answer #10
·
answered by classic 6
·
0⤊
3⤋