Why did jesus not speak out against pedophilia? Does that mean he approved?

Answer 1

No of course he did not approve of pedophilia. For Jesus loved the little children as evidenced in this verse:
Mark 10:14 When Jesus saw this, he was angry. He said to his disciples, "Let the little children come to me. Don't keep them away. God's kingdom belongs to people like them.

Certainly this verse shows how Jesus protected the children. He was not allowing them to be held back, for he wanted them to come to him. Jesus would not approve of anyone hurting the children, in those days the adult and child relationship was different than today. I don't think there was a rampant problem with child abuse, their laws were very strict regarding the care of children and also with regard to sexual relations. I think it doesn't need to be explicitly stated in the bible to understand how God feels about respecting the innocence of children

Answer 2

If Jesus never spoke against pedophiles, then I will need a pair of scissors to take out Matthew 18:6, Mark 9:42 and Luke 17:2. All verses in which Jesus pronounces judgment on anyone who does anything to harm a child. These would include not only sexual, but physical and emotional abuse.

Try actually reading the sayings of Jesus before making your next posting.

Answer 3

Jesus did not speak out about many things- and very little at all about any form of sex-related issues, good or bad. He was not trying to micromanage people's lives, just give some new guidelines for believing in a faith that had become stagnant.

He said over and over that the foundational Mosaic laws were still in place (although sometimes misunderstood and misapplied)- and that is where most of the guidelines for living come in.

Answer 4

Do you go around speaking out against peeing on people's living room floors? I'm guessing you don't -- but that doesn't mean that you approve of such an act.

There was no reason for Jesus to state the obvious. There was no reason for Him to speak out against things that people already knew were wrong anyway.

.

Answer 5

No the place - genuinely no the place - interior the 4 gospels will you hit upon Jesus saying something against homosexuality. interior the recent testomony you have Romans a million and that's somewhat it, and that became Paul. Now, of direction, Jesus did no longer communicate a pair of lot of issues. He did no longer communicate approximately cats, as an occasion. He did no longer communicate approximately lunar eclipses. There existed cats back then and additionally lunar eclipses. one element Jesus DID communicate approximately became ghosts - in Luke 24:39 Jesus explicitly states that he isn't a ghost which, of direction, extra suitable than means that ghosts are genuine. yet there are various many Christians who declare ghosts are no longer genuine and that the Bible `proves' there are no longer any `ghosts' whilst, in fact, that's not actual (see Mark 9:4, Matthew 27:fifty two-fifty 3, Matthew 14, 1 samuel 28) and, interior the comparable way, there are various many Christians who declare Jesus condemns homosexuality interior the Bible whilst that, in fact, is likewise no longer actual. Why, then, are those claims made? because of the fact many many Christians do no longer study their own Bible - they only settle for what's advised them from the pulpit or from learn publications or from their prayer team. I undergo in ideas as quickly as chatting with a born-returned Christian who did no longer have faith Psalm fifty one:10, which includes the line, `Create in me a sparkling coronary heart, O my God, and renew a maximum surprising spirit interior me' became interior the Bible because of the fact, being `saved', why could one would desire to `renew a maximum surprising spirit'? And why could God `placed that interior the Bible' whilst it wasn't actual? I had to get a Bible and coach him the Psalm. hi, have faith what you % to have faith yet whilst that perception forces a gay survivor of a companion's dying out of the homestead they shared and denies people undemanding dignity the relaxing's over and, somewhat, Christians would desire to start analyzing the great Bible until now they talk on subject concerns. And everybody responding, please do no longer trot out previous testomony crap in this - you be attentive to rattling properly none of you concern yourselves with something in Leviticus except you're into bashing gays or putting down women individuals.

Answer 6

well, since the fact that there is no evidence that God doesn't exist means that God does exist, then logically if Jesus was never said anything against pedophilia then He must be for it, so yes, he approved.

Answer 7

in his three year mission, as far as we know, how could he possibly get to everything. I agree with others that mention .......... 'better be a millstone hung around his neck' than to hurt a child believing in god.
having sex with a very young girl would probably do irrepairable damage to her, and I doubt if jesus or mohammed would condone it.
since old age, by and large, was what we term middle age now, life, without all the luxuries, would be such that we could not understand their cultures

Answer 8

I think Free thinker has got it right most people didn`t live to see 30 in those days so they could hardly wait till they were 20 to marry and have kids

Answer 9

Does this verse?

Matthew 18:6

"But whoso shall offend one of these little ones which believe in me, it were better for him that a millstone were hanged about his neck, and that he were drowned in the depth of the sea."

Answer 10

Wow, I'm not a christian and I can answer this one:
Matthew 18:6 "But whoso shall offend one of these little ones which believe in me, it were better for him that a millstone were hanged about his neck, and that he were drowned in the depth of the sea."

I think that about covers it. NEXT!