good one =)
of course, they will just say you are misrepresenting the text and it doesn't mean what it says, or that things have changed - yeah, once we thought the earth was flat, and once upon a time some stupid people believed in a dude up in the clouds.
2006-12-24 12:10:38
·
answer #1
·
answered by leer 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
I love this question.
Your question is still out of context because Christians are not Jews. Only Jews were under this covenant and law. If it is to be asked in its true context you would have to add the condition , if you were a Jew , and assuming that the person was a Jew and that he believed in the law and the covenant, he would, and so would you if all these conditions were fulfilled.
To ask if a non Jew would follow the Jewish law is absurd. If you ask a Christian wether it is right to obey God the answer is yes, but here too you will not get your desired result in truth, because any heathen would say that and the proof is in all the various laws every tribe had from their religious customs and traditions.I f you ask wether as a human the person would reject those laws on the basis of some individual sense of right and wrong, then you are asking a question that no one can possibly know now.
In addition, you are injectiing your own present cultural conditioning, assuming that it is wrong, and you are hypocrite if you are a relativist today, by implying that this is somehow wrong when you have no right to.
Unless you are a Christian which I wish for your benefit that you were, you cannot pronounce this wrong, because you do not believe in an authoritative right and wrong, only relative culturally detrmined , non-binding values. Isn't that how you you talk in college class when ethics comes up and you follow the current trends, and latest fashionable list of what it is ok to hate, and what it is ok to accept? and you think you are so liberal and loving. When in truth this is hate to all mankind, and love to self
2006-12-24 15:17:22
·
answer #2
·
answered by Socinian F 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
You quote Jesus and you forget approximately that He already mentioned this subject be counted. The very people back then requested Jesus the comparable question. undergo in ideas the female caught interior the act of adultery? As for reaching the objective of the regulation. How does hate mongering achieve this? and that's the element. people were utilising faith to push their hate and lack of knowledge and Jesus became indignant at this. in case you hadn't be conscious how plenty Jesus disliked the clergymen, because of the fact they did precisely what you're thinking maximum surprising now. utilising the regulation UNLAWFULLY. besides, i'm hoping you place out those issues on actual conversations with theologians or scholars so which you will desire to get all your questions replied for the reason which you of course does no longer study each thing in this internet site. providing you with the ease of the doubt, I gave you an truthful answer and that i'm hoping you're no longer in basic terms asking this so which you will locate somebody who consents with you as a replace of somebody who somewhat provides the actual reasons for those verses and so on. Afaik those regulations have been certainly given to the Jews, as you will see that interior the NT, you will locate lots of gentiles who do no longer shop on with those regulations and you hit upon that the apostles and Jesus himself became silent approximately it. -as for obeying it- you would be able to desire to apply "love" as a handbook, that's the only lawful use of the regulation.
2016-12-11 15:32:55
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Never! Never! Never! If I say never three times, then it is legal, and I don't have to kill my kid.
As far as your Old Testament God is concerned, I don't want to hear all the damn rules he made up to confuse and terrilfy the snivelling ancient humans.
Don't bother me with your Old Testament God, or your New Testament God for that matter. What's wrong with you! Jesus already died for your curses, not to mention your parents' curses too.
It's Christmas and I'm about ready to have a tantrum, it's raining and I'm bloated -- and now you tell me cursing is a felony?? Good God Almighty, this just about does it for me -- hold on, there's someone at the doo
2006-12-24 12:10:32
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
You're right, You didn't take it out of context. Just think , if we lived like that now, there would be no prisons, no gangs, no rioting, no stealing, No crime at all. It would sure straighten up all those punk assed kids in a hurry if they knew they would be stoned to death for screwing up.
2006-12-24 13:25:07
·
answer #5
·
answered by mitch 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
No. I would simply say,"times have changed.Instead of killing you,I shall do worse. No girlfriend/boyfriend,no tv,no computer,no sunlight.You are staying in your room. You can have all of your electronics,but the cords and batteries have been taken. Have fun."
Who am I? I am the parent,and I am perfectly capable of forgiving my Child and moving on.
2006-12-24 12:19:23
·
answer #6
·
answered by Myaloo 1
·
1⤊
2⤋
If we went back to this, there would be a lot less smart-mouth punks running around.
2006-12-24 12:12:27
·
answer #7
·
answered by marchhare57 7
·
2⤊
1⤋
They probably would.
2006-12-24 12:09:12
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋