English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

In people's everyday speech...even in journalism, I'll notice that people say, "Speak soft when we go in there" or, "Do it quick." Do we no longer have to add "-ly"? I know languages are constantly evolving...

2006-12-24 12:03:37 · 10 answers · asked by ? 6 in Society & Culture Languages

Hold up. HERDING C...you don't know where I live??? Now THAT is funny!

2006-12-24 12:12:30 · update #1

10 answers

I have myself noticed this tendency, but mainly in American English. British, Canadian, Australian and New Zealand English seem to be more conservative. However, taking into consideration that American dominates the global entertainment scene, it will spread.
On the other hand, a language is alive and develops as it wills, so it's futile to stop such a trend. We just have to be philosophical and adjust to it.
By the way, the German language has lost its distinction between adjectives and adverbs several centuries ago, so we are probably following along that path.

2006-12-24 18:18:20 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

I've noticed the same thing, and I even read an article about it once... I wish I could remember where. If I do, I'll tell you.

But yes, linguists have noticed that it is true... grammatically incorrect as it may be. The -ly is dropping from a lot of our adverbs, reducing them to mere adjectives. I don't really have a problem with it, but I guess some people do... lol

2006-12-24 12:10:05 · answer #2 · answered by Kelleinna 2 · 3 0

Adverbs are NOT becoming extinct, they are just losing the -ly as a marker. In the sentence "Do it quick", "quick" is STILL an adverb, it just doesn't have the -ly suffix anymore. Just because it looks like the adjective "quick" doesn't make it an adjective. Take the word "surf". "Surf" is BOTH a noun and a verb. "Quick" is now BOTH an adjective and an adverb. The term adverb has a FUNCTIONAL definition (it modifies a verb, adjective, or another adverb) NOT a morphological definition.

EDIT: Haha, whoever gave me the thumbs down, let's compare our PhD's! LOLOL

2006-12-24 13:32:07 · answer #3 · answered by Taivo 7 · 0 2

I think that it is happening more often and it is predominately from American English. I think it may have something to do with the masses of those speaking English as a second language. Many languages don't have s differentiation between adjectives & adverbs, so it's difficult for new learners to get the hang of it. It means they have to think through if what they're "describing" is an action or a thing (vern or noun) and it's not always so easy for them.

In addition, many natvie English speakers in America are just as bad, due to carelessness. (Just so you know, I am American, as well.)

2006-12-24 22:05:35 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Absolutely and surely not! Verily and certainly a few blokes doing it recklessly is not going spoil the language of Kings and Queens.
Stick to the Queen's, or King's English, mate!
Good luck on you.

The Union Jack is still flying all over the globe, and the sun always shine where English is spoken properly.

Long live the Queen!

2006-12-24 13:23:21 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

you're actual incorrect, here is why: a million. the U. S. and eu economies are in magnificent shape (fluctuations are organic marketplace habit), and however the international places you reported are starting to be economically, they're no the place close to the U. S. or eu, nor will they ever realistically attain those stages with out super social and political substitute to stabilize the upward push. look on the consistent with Capita GDP (conventional earnings of a citizen) of the U. S. and eu as against China or India; US=$40-one,800, eu=$28,one hundred, China=$6,800, India=$3,3 hundred (CIA international Factbook). 2. Japan's economy has been slumping by using fact the 1990's, it somewhat is poised again decrease back, yet won't adventure strengthen close to China or India by using fact it somewhat is already a stepped forward united states of america and there in basic terms isn't as lots room for strengthen. (Japan economy overview) 3. English is one in each of India's decent languages, and it somewhat is the main predominantly used language interior the country. India is the main populous English speaking united states of america interior the international (India people) 4. maximum faculties interior the international require English skillability to graduate, as maximum professional literature in written in English. for this reason in basic terms approximately all and sundry interior the international with a school training talk English. As a forex student at a school in Mexico, i replaced into amaze to earnings that maximum textbooks used there (for college training carried out in Spanish) have been in English. Spanish language variations of the books did no longer exist. 5. jap won't be spoken exterior of Japan, business employer between jap and distant places agencies is carried out in English. English is a required classification for college pupils in Japan. 6. Mandarin is starting to be in capability as a language in China and lots of Asia, yet there in basic terms are not Mandarin instructors for the duration of the international to show the language and China isn't sufficient of an financial rigidity yet to make others talk their language, so as that they learn English. that's a lot much less puzzling for chinese language to earnings English (like non-English speaking international places do) than for the international to earnings Mandarin. I even have 3 college stages (Accounting, international business employer, and Spanish), talk fluent Spanish and intermediate French. Studied and lived in Mexico for a 12 months, and that i presently paintings interior the international business employer container.

2016-10-18 23:10:57 · answer #6 · answered by reus 4 · 0 0

I totally (note "ly") agree with you on this subject. That's a shame. A lot of English speakers make fun at foreigners who don't speak English but little do they know it's the Engish speakers who have been destroying the language.

2006-12-24 12:54:12 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

I don't tradionally or whole-heartedly believe that adverbs are quickly to disappear from the English language.

:P

2006-12-24 18:51:34 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

The Dumbing of America marches on. The language is deteriorating rather than evolving, if you ask me.

2006-12-24 12:32:31 · answer #9 · answered by CrankyYankee 6 · 0 3

Not as far as I can tell. I don't know where you live, but where I live, adverbs are still in use!

2006-12-24 12:06:47 · answer #10 · answered by Stimpy 7 · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers