Creationists can't answer it, it is one of their gajillion holes in that silly theory of theirs. Come on, send me evidence for creationism and I can debunk it. Send me a debunking of evolution and I will disprove it.
Scientifically.
Creationism is stupid.
Really, BarkleyVader@yahoo.com
EDIT
See, their faith is at stake so they give me thumbs down as if God is going to spank me if they do or something.
2006-12-24 11:35:41
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
3⤋
I'd like to know what artist was time traveling to find out whether or not Adam had nipples. Seriously, you're basing your reasoning on artists's conception and taking that as fact? What's so mindboggling about the first man not having nipples? How is that a "debunking of creationism" people? Nipples?? Jeez use your brains. Since that's why you "evolved" them. And since he was the first man, he didn't have a belly button either. Your question answered itself by the way. It does make sense why he wouldn't have that stuff: because he wasn't born from a womb. Ergo, he didn't need them. But, his children, when they were born, did need them, so they had them. Dee dee dee.
2006-12-24 11:56:41
·
answer #2
·
answered by neired82 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
You can't be serious about the church thing. Look what they did to Jesus and Mary.
And what got you thinking about Adams nipples!? You are a funny person!
2006-12-24 11:43:31
·
answer #3
·
answered by catscratch 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
interior the womb somewhat one starts of neither male or female, hence nipples and a penis initiate to develop. The various quantities of hormones that are given to the toddler anticipate its sex. hence all adult males are left with nipples - because the unique ability for brests and women human beings are left with clitorisis - which the position orginally the start of a penis.
2016-12-01 03:48:41
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Literal interpretation of christian creation mythology instead of being able to recognize the symbolism for what it is, is a trap many of the religious easily fall into.
2006-12-24 11:49:25
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Is there a way to reason without the effort of reasoning?
Creationism and religion in general can perform this miracle!
2006-12-24 11:38:21
·
answer #6
·
answered by DrEvol 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Oh man dude, you're totally bashing on Christianity with all sorts of logic. If being an Atheist means being like you, sign me up!
2006-12-24 11:36:12
·
answer #7
·
answered by Atlas 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
Get a grip mate!!! you're living in a world of fantasy!!!
2006-12-24 11:37:06
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
He was a hermorphidite...
2006-12-24 11:36:02
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
I think so...
2006-12-24 12:15:40
·
answer #10
·
answered by Triton 3
·
0⤊
0⤋