Just taking a poll
Do you believe in Creationism:God created the universe using science
or
BigBang and evolution:Wich pretty much thinks and says "it just happen." No intelligent being,no creation, "it just happened."
2006-12-24 07:07:53 · 12 answers · asked by Maurice H 6 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
You REALLY think evolution has ANYTHING to do with the origins of all existence? It DOESN'T. And you REALLY think that evolution happened in leaps and bounds, that it's somehow rapid and sudden? Also WRONG. Human evolution occurred by means of a series of infinitesimal steps over a period of many many MANY many thousands of years.
2006-12-24 07:11:59 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
The Bigbang and evolution are very seperate theories.
Evolution is a proven 'theory' (A scientific theory is different than a theory in a general community. There is no way science can promote all of macro-evolution to a scientific prinicple for obvious reasons, but the general premisis of macro evolution is a fact.
The Big Bang theory, while accepted by the majority of scientists, does not have nearly the amount of evidence of Evolution.
They deal with seperate things, obviously anyone with scientific knowledge will accept macro evolution, but they are not dependent on each other.
2006-12-24 07:13:45 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Your two choices are meaningless and your question is loaded. You could be a Creationist who believes God is haphazard and inconsistent, not "scientific". The big bang and evolution do not disprove the existence of God.. Your "it just happens" bit shows you are far to biased to be taking a poll. If you were honest, wouldn't you poll scientists in the science section?
Evolution is not about belief. I might have had a career in evolution research if I were more politically savvy. As is, I've compared to many genetic sequences to find evidence for anything but evolution.
2006-12-24 13:01:07 · answer #3 · answered by novangelis 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Scientist, Evolution, Big Bang on current evidence.
Randomness appearing to underlie everything.
2006-12-24 07:21:26 · answer #4 · answered by Pedestal 42 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
definite, a working laptop or laptop scientist is a scientist. laptop technology is the learn of the theoretical foundations of information and computation, and their utility in computers. As its call implies, laptop technology is a organic technology, no longer an utilized technology or utilized employer field. As an analogy to the scientific field, a working laptop or laptop scientist is like the main cancers researcher who could learn molecular biology or biochemistry in-intensity, whilst a awareness technologies professional is like the healthcare professional who analyze those fields at an stronger point and makes a speciality of their utility to affected person care.
2016-10-28 07:25:45 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I believe Creationism supports the Big Bang, not evolution. The Big Bang says it happened at a certain time (maybe 13.5 billion years ago). The Bible says in the beginning... This says at a certain time.
2006-12-24 07:11:31 · answer #6 · answered by RB 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Well, I believe in creationism. God created the everything using science. This doesn't means he required science for help. He created it this way so that we can discover and learn.
2006-12-24 07:43:47 · answer #7 · answered by A Friend of Yours 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Creationism via the Big Bang!
2006-12-24 07:15:00 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Biological evolution of species is a fact-the origins of life and the big bang are seperate issues. You can question the big bang but no scientist can question evolution and retain any intellectual credibility.
2006-12-24 07:13:12 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Big Bang & then Evolution. Separate and distinct.
Science states that matter and energy cannot be CREATED nor destroyed - only change forms. So, no creator.
2006-12-24 07:14:23 · answer #10 · answered by YDoncha_Blowme 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋