Happy Holy Days
Blessings on All
Peace and Love
2006-12-24 04:58:09 · 21 answers · asked by digilook 2 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
In general, this is a logical fallacy, shifting the burden of proof (as others have said). But there is evidence against certain views of God, mostly found in the self contradiction of the theistic texts themselves. For instance, the Abrahamic God is untenable due to logical inconsistencies in the tanakh, NT and Quran. If the ones making a claim cannot produce a coherent proposition to be demonstarated, no proof against them need be offered.
2006-12-24 05:08:13 · answer #1 · answered by neil s 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I can only tell you why I do not believe in a loving creator. No loving all powerful creator could look down on this earth and watch the abuse and molestation of innocent children and do nothing. Also if there was a creator and he she or it created the universe and everything pertaining to it. Why would that creator choose to create natural evils such as disease, bacteria and destructive weather phenomena? If there is no loving creator then these things would simply be natural occurrences. But when you inject of loving creator into the picture who could have created a world without these potentially harmful and fatal occurrences then they can only be considered evils.
2006-12-24 13:09:06 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
What proof can you offer me that Zeus doesn't exist? Or that we're all living in a marshmallow ball in the 42nd dimension of the 14th universe created by the demon, Lecifus Dominus? It's kinda fun believing in what we want, aint it?
Happy Holy Days
Blessings on All
Peace and Love
2006-12-24 13:00:58 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
"proof" is irrelevent and useless, "evidence" is what you want.
You can obtain evidence about the non-existence of God(s), but you'll never get evidence that absolutely disproves the existence of God(s), and the opposite is true also, no one can prove the existence of God(s).
Its impossible to know if your religious beliefs are absolutely true, thus you should never tell someone of a different religion that your religion is "the truth".
Most of the evidence of proving/dis-proving lies in contradiction.
Happy Holidays
Peace and Love
Blessed Be
May Allah be with you
God Bless
2006-12-24 13:07:22 · answer #4 · answered by Dr. Douche 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I can prove that the Gods / goddess don't exist but not the God
2006-12-24 13:18:14 · answer #5 · answered by un_1000 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What proof do you have to offer to show they did exist. Some people say look around and you'll see, but all I see is evolution.
2006-12-24 13:03:49 · answer #6 · answered by CLM 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
What proof can you offer that one does exist?
This is one of life's mysteries that can't be totally proven one way or another. Believing or disbelieving is both based off of faith on your beliefs.
2006-12-24 13:11:27 · answer #7 · answered by alimagmel 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The total lack of any evidence that they do.
It isn't reasonable to believe in something without any evidence. You would be left with a bunch of ridiculous stuff.
Edit: Yes I do think the "prophets" were crazy. Charlie Manson thinks he is god too. Should we all go join the "Family?"
2006-12-24 13:02:02 · answer #8 · answered by Alex 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
NONE because..
God exists in me but not someone else it's all about FAITH. I believe in God because my very own Family has seen him, and my grandpas back was hurting he pinched him and all the pain was gone. ITS TRUE HE IS ALSO ALIVE
2006-12-24 13:10:16 · answer #9 · answered by QT 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You don't prove a negative. Only the side that claims that such a thing *does* exist bears the burden of proof.
2006-12-24 12:59:47 · answer #10 · answered by angk 6 · 3⤊ 1⤋