This is where everyone goes wrong...Jesus was just a prophet...he was not a God and he told people that he was just a prophet...but..there are always ignorant people
2006-12-24 04:08:31
·
answer #1
·
answered by Rumzi? 1
·
0⤊
3⤋
He was born naturally, just as any other baby would be born, from a mothers womb. If Jesus was the son of God then why would Christians have to be called the children of God. If God really wanted to have children & grandchildren on Earth then he would have ordered Jesus Christ to marry & have children. God is a spiritual power & no spiritual being, let alone God, can ever make a child. All of Gods prophets were human beings but they are very special beings because they showed us the path to God.
2006-12-24 04:11:24
·
answer #2
·
answered by mustafa_burhani52 1
·
0⤊
1⤋
As all of us be attentive to that.. God would not have a literal spouse with whom he fathered infants. yet he's the writer of all existence. (Revelation 4:11) as a result, the 1st human that God created, Adam, is named a “son of God.” (Luke 3:38) further, the Bible teaches that Jesus became created via God. So Jesus is likewise called a “Son of God.”—John a million:40 9.
2016-10-28 07:16:46
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
He was flesh and blood, the son of Mary and Joseph. When he was on this earth, he was mortal, and human like anyone else. That is why he is the son of man, because he came down in the form of man, to do his fathers bidding.
Man is the one who puts different titles to Jesus. Even the different ones who wrote the Bible, use titles to describe Jesus. Go with whats in your heart, he is the Son of Man because he was flesh and blood when they nailed him to the cross.
2006-12-24 04:09:29
·
answer #4
·
answered by bigmikejones 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Charles Manson(mans son) says he's the son of man too. Maybe Jesus is serving time in Corcoran State Prison. It's as legitimate a statement as many that I have read on this crazy web site...
2006-12-24 04:32:00
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
There was a purpose. When he uses the Son of Man, it is to equate himself with men. Such as that he felt pain as we do, had emotions not unlike ours. When he referred to himself as the son of God, it was to show his nature, his oneness with God.
Each verse in reference describes a purpose for his chosen words.
2006-12-24 04:09:05
·
answer #6
·
answered by sweetie_baby 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
He was fully human, fully God.
He does, however, refer to Himself as the Son of God:
Matthew 16:13-17
13When Jesus came to the region of Caesarea Philippi, he asked his disciples, "Who do people say the Son of Man is?"
14They replied, "Some say John the Baptist; others say Elijah; and still others, Jeremiah or one of the prophets."
15"But what about you?" he asked. "Who do you say I am?"
16Simon Peter answered, "You are the Christ,[b] the Son of the living God."
17Jesus replied, "Blessed are you, Simon son of Jonah, for this was not revealed to you by man, but by my Father in heaven.
2006-12-24 04:14:23
·
answer #7
·
answered by padwinlearner 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
Because he is a Prophet, to say God became a man is blasphemous
'Surely, they have disbelieved who say: "Allah is the Messiah ['Iesa (Jesus)], son of Maryam (Mary)." But the Messiah ['Iesa (Jesus)] said: "O Children of Israel! Worship Allah, my Lord and your Lord." Verily, whosoever sets up partners in worship with Allah, then Allah has forbidden Paradise for him, and the Fire will be his abode. And for the Zalimun (polytheists and wrongdoers) there are no helpers.' (Qur'an 5:72)
2006-12-24 04:06:55
·
answer #8
·
answered by proud to be muslim 1
·
1⤊
5⤋
Good question - I wish these Christians will just explain and not try to confuse everybody
2006-12-24 04:08:22
·
answer #9
·
answered by Tawani 3
·
0⤊
3⤋
sweetie_b has it right.
It's a lenghty documentaion, to deep for this text box.
>>>>>>>><<<<<<<
2006-12-24 04:15:12
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋