With the Overwhelming Evidence Proving 911 Was An Inside Job, Why do People choose not to believe?

Question

Are they stupid?

If you never heard of this before watch 911 Mysteries on google video.

Answer 1

you talk a load of rubish

Answer 2

I think the first answer to your question sums it up:
It upsets people,
They can't handle it.
It upsets me that I am living alongside grown ups who are too afraid to acknowledge that self evident truth to themselves.
It doesn't need 911 Mysteries to reveal it-it's so damn obvious, all by itself, an elementary understanding of physics sums it all up, what the political details are I can't guess.
Truly frightening to find quite how blind people can choose to be. Feel good that you're not brainwashed. Personally I am astounded, and shocked, and it's ongoing. It's like living amongst brain dead machines. However all the people I have respected previously also know, (not just believe) it could not have been anything but an inside job.-so have I put them on a list? again-more frightening and surreal than any film you'll watch.
love to you.

Answer 3

right that's why: because of the fact people believe their government too plenty and picture that something the U. S. government says would desire to be actual. the government mentioned it became Osama, so it might desire to be Osama. even however the information shows that 9/11 became planned and staged, as a reason to take down Iraq. people have had plenty "freedom" that they think of they are invincible and can't open their eyes to attain that their own government is the actual enemy.

Answer 4

What overwhelming evidence? I haven't seen any ( from reputable sources). I think Adolf Hitler said that people are more likely to believe a big lie than a small one. It looks like you prove his statement.

Answer 5

Not a good opening line if your on this page hunting a date.

Answer 6

What does this question have to do with Singles and Dating?

Answer 7

Nothing to see here, move along people....

Answer 8

wrong place?

Answer 9

stop this....you are upsetting people....

Answer 10

911 conspiracy theory is full of holes too although those films can be quite compelling. There are just too much 'cherry picking' of facts, interview excerpts... etc. Here's some example how they twist facts to create dramatic 911 stories.

Some bloggers and 911 theorists say hijackers are found alive and links to BBC article titled ‘Hijack 'suspects' alive and well.’ What they don’t say is that this BBC article is about confusion over hijackers’ true identities. It appears hijackers may have assumed someone else's IDs. Criminals using false IDs? Hard to believe? BBC article ends by saying “FBI Director Robert Mueller acknowledged on Thursday that the identity of several of the suicide hijackers is in doubt.” That’s why the title put quotation mark around ‘suspects’ when it says ‘suspects alive and well.’

You can read this BBC entire article here http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/1559151.stm
You’ll notice in the middle of this BBC article titled ‘Hijack 'suspects' alive and well’ it also says in bold face ‘Mistaken Identity.’ Conspiracy gurus never even finished the entire article it appears and have reading comprehension of sixth grader. This article is used to claim that hijackers are made up/fake people in this ‘conspiracy.’ Yes, it’s sad. Please read the entire article and learn something called CONTEXT.

Twin towers never fell at free fall speed as Professor Jones claims. He makes eye ball estimate and do not make actual measurements. Several have made calculations showing the towers fell close to free fall because of massive kinetic energy, but frame by frame calculation shows it does not fall at ‘free fall’ speed. You can actually see some debris falling faster than building is collapsing in some footages. Usually demolition takes almost month of gutting and preparation for much smaller buildings. Twin towers were not taken down with bombs as claim by some. http://www.debunking911.com

Building 7 had a giant hole stretching over 10 floors and its picture exists, but conspiracy theorists probably don't want you to see since it dampens their 'demolition' theory. See the photo here. http://www.debunking911.com/pull.htm Conspiracy theorists do not discuss this massive structural damage, but talk about ‘pull’ quote that is very vague and arbitrary. Why would Silverstein, who is not familiar with demolition at all, use demolition slang to admit something so odd on national TV? That doesn’t make sense.

911 conspiracy theory claim Rumsfeld said flight 93 was shot down. On 9-11-01 it is Cheney who mistakenly believes 2 planes were shot down by Airforce during the attacks. Cheney have ordered to take down any hijacked planes that may be heading for a target after WTC was hit. Rumsfeld tells Cheney he knows one plane is down, but can’t confirm who brought down the plane (flight 93). This episode was explained in PBS’s Frontline: Dark Side. They had obtained actual transcript of their conversation. You can see this transcript here http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/darkside/view/ Cheney/Rumsfeld conversation is shown in ‘part one’ at beginning of documentary. Lot of stories about gov shooting down flight 93, missile theories...etc seem to have originated from this.

Rumsfeld was in Pentagon when it was hit and helped rescue crew which was caught on video. Why would he or others order missile to hit it when they're in the building. Several light poles at near by high way were knocked down short ways from Pentagon. Did single missile swerve around in chasing after skinny light poles before hitting pentagon? Was it a big fat Tomahawk missile that is wide as commercial airliner’s wing span? Some cars were damaged too by the plane grazing over highways.
http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread79655/pg1
http://www.aerospaceweb.org/question/conspiracy/q0274.shtml

Many claim Pentagon had auto missile defense that could have shot down planes entering its airspace, but such project really never took full effect because of fear that civilian plane may be shot down and might pose danger to neighboring residents. Can you imagine some newly licensed pilot flying single engine Cessna into Pentagon air space getting shot down by missile or anti aircraft guns? Richard Clarke, former counter-terrorism official explained this. Ask him about it. How many times do you see planes go off course by accident? Gov officials didn’t want to endanger its own citizens for extremely unlikely scenario.

Some claim debunking911 websites are debunked and links to infowar website, but there they only discuss ‘pull’ comment again which is very vague and arbitrary and they do not discuss other countless flaws in 911 conspiracy theory. They do not explain the fact that many experts have explained ‘molten metals’ and several structural engineers and experts have disputed Steve Jones’s (physicist and not structural engineer) theory.

Debunking911 websites were never debunked, because 911 theorists never explained why things in debunking911 websites are wrong. There are just too many odd assumptions in these 911 theories. 911 theorists do engage in what we now call ‘cherry picking of information’ in order to complete their picture of reality.

Why would government kill 3000 of it own citizens to make case for a war when they can just generate evidence of WMD using intelligence which is so much easier? The US went to war without UN Security Council clearance anyways and have taken military actions without UN clearance in the past. If we can go to war whenever we want to why kill 3000 people? Just for the fun?

Why would so many authorities make bold claims that reveal this so called 'inside job' if it is inside job? As 911 theory people claim. Did Nixon ever go on TV and say 'oh yea I bugged those suckers' before whole thing became public? Lot of 911 theory claims don't make sense. If you have secret plot to bring down buildings and disguise it as terrorism would you tell people about it on TV interviews or in public?


They claim Larry Silverstein, owner of WTC building 7 confessed to blowing it up by saying he ‘pulled.’ ‘Pull’ is slang for implosion used by demolitionist. Silverstein is not one. Why would he use slang to admit blowing up his own building on national TV interview? I guess its good way to skip insurance money. If he is in on this ‘inside job’ why the hec does he tell about it on national TV interview. Silverstein is either biggest idiot in the world OR he simply meant he ‘pulled’ fire fighters out of building 7 so they won’t die.

http://www.debunking911.com/
http://www.loosechangeguide.com/lcg2.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/7_World_Trade_Center
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/wtc/

These websites do well disputing stupid 911 theories.

Have you read entire official accounts? 911 commision? No, you just watched 'internet movies' and all the sudden you're expert on 911. Does that make sense? Don't be an internet zombie.