http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20061217/ap_on_re_us/military_recruiters_cocaine
2006-12-24 01:55:35 · 13 answers · asked by WORD UP G 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
If it's true ("IF"), then they should be arrested, prosecuted as drug dealers, and kicked out of the military with loss of all pay and benefits they have coming......end of story!!
2006-12-24 02:02:06 · answer #1 · answered by LSF 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I've said it before. Every house has a junk drawer. I am a Marine and this is just unsat. Recruiters sometimes get drawn in to the ways of some civilians. I don't want to insult anyone but from what I have seen, Marines are the best all-around people I know.
"The Marines I have seen around the world have the cleanest bodies, the filthiest minds, the highest morale, and the lowest morals of any group of animals I have ever seen. Thank GOD for the United States Marine Corps." - Eleanor Roosevelt, 1945
2006-12-24 02:07:42 · answer #2 · answered by Charlie B 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I'm not going to anwer the question because the article never said the recruiters gave students drugs.
I will say that the recruiters involved with the drug running should go to jail. They should lose all their benifits from the military. They disgraced the military and themselves by being a part of this illegal activity.
2006-12-24 02:22:48 · answer #3 · answered by Raptork9 2 · 3⤊ 0⤋
it somewhat isn't the coverage of the army Recruiting Command. If authentic, the recruiters in touch are open to costs of violating sturdy rules and thoughts. that could set off an instantaneous analyze, because attempting to "conceal-up" the incident could be honestly catastrophic to the perpetrators. those recruiters could be suspended from recruiting responsibilities for the size of analyze. If accountable, they could be difficulty to disciplinary action below the UCMJ and punished thus because of the fact the commander determines. If harmless, they could be returned to accountability, despite the fact that with a probably flow to a sparkling region to eliminate any backlash from the community and to furnish the guy a sparkling start up. the flicks that are shown are the prolonged play commercials in line with those broadcast on television.
2016-10-28 07:08:05 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The article does say that none of the recruiters were accused of providing drugs to high school students, it just seemed to be a side line of theirs.
As for what I think of this in principle, high school students should not be provided with these substances by anyone.
In terms of 'is the military drug free'. I know they love their beer and cigs like no one else and that soldiers have used speed 'historically' to stay awake on duty.
But you need to be fit to fight, so on the whole no major drug use can be tolerated.
2006-12-24 02:09:35 · answer #5 · answered by mince42 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Well the recruit signs on the dotted line and fails the drug test the recruiter makes his numbers, and the recruit dosent have to actually join
2006-12-24 16:19:38 · answer #6 · answered by usamedic420 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
You DID read the article right?
working while under suspicion, a newspaper reported Sunday.
"None of the recruiters was accused of providing drugs to students."
The recruiters, who worked in the Tucson area, were targets of a federal
2006-12-24 02:56:55 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
You obviously didn't even read your own source article.
Right there in the second paragraph, the article explicitly states that none of the recruiters gave any drugs to any students.
Go find something else to whine about.
2006-12-24 03:23:49 · answer #8 · answered by Dave_Stark 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I don't usually think about military recruiters providing drugs. Probably because it is EXTREMELY rare.
However, I do think about the drug Riatlin that is WAY over prescribed to children.
2006-12-24 02:16:48 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Get them all drugged up so that they can convince them to sign on the dotted line.
2006-12-24 02:27:49 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋