I'm serious.
2006-12-24 00:24:52 · 16 answers · asked by silvercomet 6 in Family & Relationships ➔ Weddings
The word vulgar means "common" 2.45 ct stone is NOT common
The vast majority of women would be thrilled to have a diamond that big.
2006-12-24 01:34:50 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
The size of the stone is not directly proportional to the amount of love you will get back. If you are trying to cement the relationship with a big stone, you are making a mistake. If you want to buy a quality, well designed, certified diamond ring of that size because you love the woman so much that you want her to have a rock that big, then go for it. Consider an alternative....a one carat diamond in the solitaire for the engagement ring, then a wedding band that contains several diamonds with a total carat weight of 1 carat or more. Just a thought.
2006-12-24 02:20:08 · answer #2 · answered by teacupn 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i imagine that's too a lot. i imagine that's insane that you gave him a particular requirement. i'm wondering that when he requested about tastes he replaced into probably soliciting for which decrease you want, and what kind of putting you want. . . not length. I have a chum with slender palms with a a million.16 carat and it seems insanely huge on her finger. i'd a lot extremely have a .seventy 5 carat extremely fantastic diamond than to have a crappy 2 carat rock. i'm also not extremely confident the position you've arise with the concept because you've been at the same time 5 years you're entitled to a larger ring. no matter if you've been courting 6 months or 10 years he can purchase what he could have the funds for. The nonetheless customary rule, although not the right all be all rule is two months income. i do not understand a instructor alive that makes 15,000 in 2 months. you extremely do sound fed on with the materialism of the ring, extremely than the meaning in the back of it.
2016-12-01 03:31:05 · answer #3 · answered by cheathem 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
wow ... 2.45 carat diamond ... lucky girl ... no its not vulgar unless you use it in a way to shove it others faces ... give it under the best intentions and make sure the girl your giving it to is the "one". Best Wishes!!
2006-12-24 03:26:49 · answer #4 · answered by emnari 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Not in the least. Unless you are on some sort of assistance or disability.
Unless your fiance is in a job where this won't make a difference, the stone might be a bit too large. A 2 c might be better.
Congratulations!
2006-12-24 04:04:25 · answer #5 · answered by weddrev 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
This is dependent upon what you like, I love diamonds, would not find any diamond vulgar! That is a very strange word to use to describe a diamond. Have a blessed Christmas and a very joyous New Year! God bless****
2006-12-24 00:29:30 · answer #6 · answered by ? 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I don't know if its vulgar, but its a very big ring and though most women may like a big ring, I personally find it gudy (sp?). You have to remember things get stolen and lost, and rings take a special place in a women's heart.
2006-12-24 00:30:24 · answer #7 · answered by Athera78 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
When it comes to diamonds Sweetie, there is no such thing as vulgarity. Smile
2006-12-24 09:31:06 · answer #8 · answered by ncamedtech 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
there is no such thing as a vulgar diamond ring. I am serious and she is lucky
2006-12-24 00:28:13 · answer #9 · answered by CindyLu 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
What would be vulgar about a stone?? I think you should change your choice of wording...
2006-12-25 04:09:25 · answer #10 · answered by VAWeddingSpecialist 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋