when it comes to illegal immigration? Do you think the money that is paid in racketearing or bribes or lobby sponsored stuff is what is important to the Feds and State guys ....or is your tax dollar. Seems it's good for cheap Mexican labor for the richies, but sucky for the rest of us. We are a democracy right. Doesn't the guy with the most people win. Why aren't we winning. Supposedly, 90% want illegal immigrants gone.
2006-12-23 17:22:23 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Immigration
contempl: Please be sure I don NOT deperage government workers. I mean our Sen and Con. What you say is so true and more. Once we get the illegals out ...if we do, we need to stop ANY money going to the Sen and Con. people of this country. We will pay them in tax dollars, period!
2006-12-23 17:43:42 · update #1
If you are working for an employer you are taxed on 34% or more of your income.
If you are a individual owner or sole proprietor of a business then between 30-28%.
If you own a corporation then 25%-22% of your income is taken away from you. So whether you are an immigrant or not. If you work for yourself and are incorporated your keeping more of your personal take home income than a CEO working for a corporation. Feds and State "guys", as you put it are government employees and really don't take home as much as the high wheeling wealthy who keep more money because of their corporate self employed tax status, this gives them extra money to "fund" the political campaigns and promote their own agendas through whichever candidate they are supporting. they have alot more money than little old me checking the $3.00 box to donate my pitly change to the Presidential Election Fund on my tax form.
2006-12-23 17:30:58 · answer #1 · answered by contemplateintention 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
CEOs gets a commission for starting to be value in a business corporation. If the shareholders (particularly, the reimbursement committee) thinks somebody has created or is extremely possibly to create X million funds, then they are going to make arrangements to pay him X. "what's good for usa" has easily no longer something to do with it. this is what the reimbursement committee thinks is good for a business corporation. in the event that they think of they could get somebody who will create $a hundred and twenty million well worth of value interior the business corporation, yet who will paintings for below $60 million, then they're going to hire him and pay him $60 million somewhat. None of this is inevitably undesirable for the financial gadget, presented that the companies get their funds's well worth. despite if this is a good ingredient for the country socially is an entire 'nother dialogue. And, different than for the funds that CEOs positioned into cheap fees (or perhaps a number of that), ALL of their reimbursement is going decrease back into the financial gadget one way or the different. They guy who scrapes the barnacles off the CEO's yacht? If the CEO could no longer have adequate funds a yacht, he'd be out of a job. Now, this is an open question as to if having the large-wealthy do the earnings redistribution is the terrific, maximum economically effective thank you to do it, despite the fact that it sort of feels to paintings extra suitable than maximum "soak the wealthy" tax schemes, which seem to force the two the effective skills besides because of the fact the overpaid spongers remote places.
2016-11-23 14:31:49 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Even though there are not as many Corporations as there are people in the United States, the Corporations each contribute millions upon millions of dollars a year to the Republicans. Republicans tend to be business owners.. and head of corporatiions that want cheap labor. That is why it continues. Why do you think Bush proposed amnesty for all of the Mexicans .. as thousands of other people are waiting to be American citizens the legal way are put to the end of the line ?
2006-12-23 17:29:26 · answer #3 · answered by tysavage2001 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Our tax dollars are worth more however we pay that to the IRS. Corporations pay their bribes directly to the guys who have your vote up for sale.
2006-12-23 22:37:32 · answer #4 · answered by jerofjungle 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
But a dollar in my pocket is worth more than a dollar in someones pocket who is not supposed to be here!
2006-12-23 18:53:12 · answer #5 · answered by Anarchy99 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Dollar is a Dollar, and a Peso is a Peso
2006-12-23 18:28:52 · answer #6 · answered by ram456456 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋