Are they trying to take our guns so we'll be sitting ducks or to cut down on crime?

Answer 1

Bound's hubby here:

First, most members of Congress are lawyers. Most of these distinguished lawyers cut their teeth as criminal defense attorneys. Most their experience is restricted to the protection of the crinimal's rights... not the protection of rights of victims or lawful private citizens. That being said...

If you look at the newly elected democratically controlled Congress' agenda has gun control as a cornerstone. This gun control agenda incudes registration and radical gun prohibition. This is from a Congress that promotes granting illegal aliens ammnesty and granting them immediate access to your hard earned social security dollars until you are somewhere beyond age 63.

If you look at the FBI Unified crime report, states that have granted it's citizens that right to carry concealed see lower levels of violent against the person. Concealed carry is a privelege granted by the Republicans and abhored by Liberals and Democrats. After all, concealed carry and gun ownership threatens their former clients.

I believe the Liberals and Democrats want to make us sitting ducks and have no clue as to how to reduce crime. I believe Liberals and Democrats would legislate mandated tattooing the word "victim" on the foreheads of every American if they could ger away with it.

Am I paranoid... no. I am a realist looking at the facts and past practice.

Answer 2

They is a very broad word.
I can confirm to you that tyrants and dictators must first disarm the citizens to turn them into subjects.
Fight with all your might, don't give up your rights.

Hey person above me, It is not paranoia if they really after all your guns. Get an education and learn about your history or your doomed to repeat it.

When will the law makers learn that making new laws won't help, Criminals disobey the laws that's part of what makes them criminals.
We had more than enough restrictive gun laws in 1938 and they should enforce those and not make any more.

Gun control is the theory that an 110lb woman has the right to wrestle with an 220lb rapist.

To the person beneath me here is a few names of people who don't want you to be able to protect yourself.
Sarah Brady
Diane Feinstein
Gov. Jim Doyle
Mayor Michael Bloomberg
Sen. Frank Lautenberg
Sen. Hillary Clinton
Sen. Ted Kennedy Even John Kerry has a 20+ year record of stomping on our rights as citizens, and then runs for presidency and claims well I am a hunter, I wont take those away. (LIAR)
this is just a few of the rabidly anti second amendment people in our government.
The second amendment is not about hunting, it is about our inalienable rights to protect our selves from every thing, including our own government gone wild.
Please don't anyone say, "well the police will protect me".
It has already been proved in supreme court rulings that the police are not here to protect you, they are for law enforcement, they can not be every where at every time.
It is your responsibility to learn how and then defend yourselves and your families.
If you don't the cops will be taking your pictures and drawing chalk around your bodies, not around a fallen criminal.

Why would I need a permit to exercise a constitutionally recognized right of all people, That's an infringement.

Answer 3

The government isn't trying to take the guns away from the good citizens, for the sake of making them sitting ducks. They are just trying to curtail the amount of guns that are out there and being used by criminals.
But the one thing that will happen is that criminals will be the ones with guns. And the citizens will have no protection.

Answer 4

With sufficient nukes to spoil the international ten circumstances over, some fantastic tuning of the military would nicely be so as. I doubt that any one is attempting to remove any ones guns. The structure says that we've the right to bare hands, yet what number and what variety? i'd experience sorry for the chump or chumps which could come right here and take a verify out to take over.

Answer 5

Sitting Ducks they are all full of it look at it this way the people that are out committing the crimes with guns are the criminals who have them illegally anyway if they take away our rights to bear arms the criminals will still have them anyway it will just take away good citizens ways of fighting back.

Answer 6

It's the only deterrent for the average citizen to have and it's protected by the Constitution. I feel safer knowing i have guns and some are specifically designed to take out human beings who are trying to take me out or even worse my family. Even if you don't want one right now don't give up your right to being able to get one because the way the worlds going you just might need it someday i might not survive some attacks but I'm going to take some of them with me.

Answer 7

With or without the gun u could be a sitting duck.

Answer 8

I have a gun so I won't be a sitting duck and that in itself cuts down on crime.......I don't know what they are trying to do.....and realistically...they don't either

Answer 9

yes they do want gun collecting,but its gonna cause a mess,it will take years.ive had guns all my life and have never had a problem,they are a tool thats dangerous,they need to be locked up ,and not to be handled by minors .guns should only be in the hands of responsable people that have no mental illness and not a criminal.

Answer 10

It has already been proven that eliminating guns does nothing to decrease crime, but there is a much darker and covert motive working here, and it has to do with tyranny.