2006-12-23 14:29:18 · 14 answers · asked by Nikia P 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
This question AGAIN?????????????
be original
2006-12-23 14:31:25 · answer #1 · answered by ~∂Їβ~ 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
The Bush family has always been close friends with the Bin Ladens. The Bin Laden family was flown out of the country on a first class US government jet just before we went to war in Afghanistan against the terrorists.
It is no accident that we have not found Osama Bin Laden.
2006-12-23 14:32:47 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
There were no WMDS. The whole WMDS claim was based on fabricated evidence. Iraq hasn't seen WMDS since 1991 when the US & UN took them away from them.
"They are in Syria"
LOL, thanks for the laugh. But seriously, keep your conspiracy theories to yourself.
"That's one of the main reasons we are in Iraq,"
The 9-11 Commision found no Iraq link to 9-11 so your theory is flawed.
"and we didn't know if they had weapons or not."
Donald Rumsfeld even said that the US knows the exact location of the WMDs. Bush said that Iraq without a doubt has WMDs so again, your claims are false, the Bush admin. said that they were 100% sure Iraq had WMDs.
"They were threatning to use them so we were worried, but we don't have them because none were found because it was a bluff."
Iraq has never threatened to use WMDs against the US and even if they did, an attack could not be made possible due to the geograpy. So again, you're way off.
"We found the weapons; sarin and mustard gas."
Sarin and mustard are merely chemicals. There were no warheads to deliver them. Either way the sarin that was found was long expired. It was made in the late 80s and sarin expires after 11 months of production so it was useless. So no, you didn't find WMDs. You may think it but don't try to make it an argument, no one's buying.
I'm done. If you (questioner) have any questions, just send me an email. Don't listen to these brainless drones.
2006-12-23 14:36:47 · answer #3 · answered by LaissezFaire 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Another poor, lost soul. Bought into the B.S. of the liberal media. Sad. Guess you kind of missed that REALLY small news blip carried by the AP last spring about having found WMD - a small cache, left over from the '79 Iran/Iraq War. But then, those don't count. Now do they... Look in Syria. Bin Laden? We had him on three separate occasions. But Bill was too busy to have been bothered. Hmmmm...
2006-12-23 14:37:38 · answer #4 · answered by Doc 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Could have had him if the US wasn't waiting for the UN to get off it's @ss. And the weapons have been transited to Syria. This was during the period the weapon inspectors were sandbagging the process and getting paid. Remember the oil-for-food scandle.
Face it as a whole, the human race needs to be reformatted or deleated. Everyone is out for themselves. If the ne Iraq regeime was really a puppet, wouldn't we be paying less for an exclusive supply of Iraqi oil? They could reimburse us with cheap oil for all we spent to liberate their sorry hides.
2006-12-23 14:35:57 · answer #5 · answered by vaughndhume 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
First of all, George Bush wants Bin Laiden but he can't find him. That's one of the main reasons we are in Iraq, and we didn't know if they had weapons or not. They were threatning to use them so we were worried, but we don't have them because none were found because it was a bluff.
2006-12-23 14:33:04 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
You can spot a person who has no mind of their own because they repeat some one elses statements. If Iraq has weapons they are most likely in Iraq.
2006-12-23 14:34:52 · answer #7 · answered by haybraindotcom 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
To me, if Clinton wanted bin laden, he would have done something to get him during the 8 years he was in office? and who DIDN'T believe that there was WMD in Iraq????
2006-12-23 14:35:07 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Mobile Chem weapons labs capable of producing enough toxins to take out half of Iraq... Buried MIGs fully armed...
I guess the Press Corp went and redefined "Mass Destruction" again!
2006-12-23 14:34:52 · answer #9 · answered by Horsmn4 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
We found the weapons; sarin and mustard gas. And is it really that easy to find one man, that looks like all the other guys in those countries; running around hiding w/ the support of just about everyone in those countries and them helping to hide him?
2006-12-23 14:38:20 · answer #10 · answered by I Hate Liberals 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
So are you suggesting we attack Pakistan?
In the same respect, we wouldn't be having this discussion had Clinton not treated terror attacks like criminal offenses and ignored the threat of the creation of Osama.
2006-12-23 14:34:27 · answer #11 · answered by time_wounds_all_heelz 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋