Such as they would NEVER be sent to a ship or squadron, instead choice orders and on shore duty for their entire career.
2006-12-23 13:56:11 · 7 answers · asked by InTROLLigent 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
People who are HIV positive are not deployable.
2006-12-23 15:04:50 · answer #1 · answered by Yak Rider 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
someone who knew a congressman! I spent 10 years on active duty and never heard such a thing. If it does exist, I imagine it would apply to a family where both were active duty military so that at least one of the parents could be with them. I'm fairly certain a single parent could also try for that consideration as well.
2006-12-23 23:15:40 · answer #2 · answered by Seattle SeaBee 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Never been in the Navy but the Navy's spent alot of time in me. And to my knowledge there is no such thing as "permanent no-deployable status"
2006-12-23 22:02:25 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
the only possible way is if both husband and wife were active duty Navy, they have a child/children, and one parent can be on shore, but the other would be on a sea command. the only way would be for the one spouse to be on a sea command the entire time he/she were in the Navy.
2006-12-23 22:01:43 · answer #4 · answered by Smith Jerrod 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Spent a lot of time in the Navy, never heard of it. Everyone was subject to deployment except for medical or hardship situtations.
2006-12-23 21:58:37 · answer #5 · answered by jack w 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I'm in the Air Force and there is this kid in my shop who is diabetic and he can't deploy
2006-12-23 23:17:52 · answer #6 · answered by ur a Dee Dee Dee 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The admiral's boyfriend(s).
2006-12-23 21:58:59 · answer #7 · answered by Timothy M 5 · 3⤊ 0⤋