make sure its logical and is scientific.
no "because I'm alive" answers plz, they dont prove anything
2006-12-23
12:58:31
·
13 answers
·
asked by
Zapking
2
in
Society & Culture
➔ Religion & Spirituality
fine then, if you do not believe in evolution, post a valid scientific reason as to why.
chucky, no offense, but that has no fact.
2006-12-23
13:06:27 ·
update #1
This is a question that will never be answered, and only serves to instigate arguments, because as long as people believe in evolution or creation, both will continue to exist.
I know I'm making an assumption here, since your question didn't mention religion, but it is in the religion category...
For the record, I am a creationist, but nothing in life is pure black and white. To say that natural selection doesn't exist, or that things don't evolve, I'd be out-rightly denying what is obvious. On the other hand, for someone to say they only believe what they can see or prove... all they have done is put their belief in logic or science. So you can't use one to prove or disprove the other because they both exist.
The only person that can give you an answer to your question is you. And to get it you will use science and faith. You'll use science to look at the facts (animals and bones that look similar) and your religion/beliefs will tell you the story of how they're connected.
2006-12-23 14:02:40
·
answer #1
·
answered by Reality check 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
Obviously an absolute disproof is not possible else evolution would go bye. However you may wish to note that the "IDEA" of evolution (because it does not pass the scientific requirements to actually be called a "THEORY")does stand in abject contradiction to the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics. The law of Entropy states, in effect, that all things move to maximum entropy, yet we are asked to believe that evolution accidentally created more and more complex entities. Also consider the probability that even the most simple DNA could have come into existence on its own. It takes RNA to create DNA but it takes DNA to create the RNA in the first place. Steven Crick, the man credited with unwrapping the secrets of the DNA strand, also calculated the probability of such a complex structure occurring on its own as somewhere around 3.7 x 10 -48000 (that's 10 to the negative 48000 power). Scientifically an event with the probability of less than 1 x 10
-55 is considered impossible anywhere in the known universe.
GO FIGURE!!!
You decide.
2006-12-23 23:01:29
·
answer #2
·
answered by CATMAN 1
·
0⤊
1⤋
The more time goes by and more things I get to know, more and more I admire the The Creation of Our Lord (the World). He has done it in 7 "days." Whereas, the term "day" certainly does not refer to 24 hours. There is NO conflict between the creation and evolution concept!
2006-12-23 21:04:57
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Holy ****, man! What the **** is wrong with you?
Never, and I mean NEVER ask a bunch of fundie Xians to prove to you that evolution is false, because they will try. They will copy and paste articles that they read elsewhere on the Internet, and upon reading them, I guarantee you that 30% to 40% of all of your brain cells will die like THAT!
Edit (to all three answerers below me): Seriously, where the **** do you people get your science information? From your pastors? Is this willfull ignorance, or simple gullibility? For starters:
http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?articleID=000D4FEC-7D5B-1D07-8E49809EC588EEDF&sc=I100322
2006-12-23 21:08:59
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
No one has ever been able to sufficiently prove it, and that's why it is still a "theory." How's that for a start?
One more thing, evil-ution is an opposition to true spirituallity (belief in Jesus Christ and the one true God of creation) It is neither a religion or a spiritual pursuit (unless personal damnation is a spiritual pursuit). So this question would belong in the science category if there is one.
2006-12-23 21:12:42
·
answer #5
·
answered by firebyknight 4
·
0⤊
2⤋
Proof that man evolved from a common ancestor with the primates has not been found, and not one species has ever been proven to evolve out of or into another. Called a theory, evolution is taught as fact, revealing the intent behind it as the devil convinces young and old alike that they evolved from apes.
2006-12-23 21:22:31
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
no reputable "scientist" would ever claim The "Theory" of Evolution has been "proven"... nor can I dis prove it. No one can do that either... it is a valid tool for scientific study...that is all it is.
2006-12-23 21:02:51
·
answer #7
·
answered by idahomike2 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
I was just digging in my back yard and I found a bunny in the Jurassic Period of the geological statum?
Just kidding.
2006-12-23 21:02:24
·
answer #8
·
answered by socialdeevolution 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
No one can disprove a fact.
Hey everyone! Try and disprove gravity!
2006-12-23 21:04:53
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
you prove the ultimate creation not evolution
2006-12-23 21:06:56
·
answer #10
·
answered by audrey_halley2004 4
·
0⤊
0⤋