As an educator myself, I would encourage you to spend some time online finding practices of other educators. Teachers are amazingly generous with their work, and there are so many sites that have 'packaged, tested' lessons as well as great ideas other educators have used (like group projects that can be ongoing thru the semester as their knowledge base increases, case studies are great, etc).
I spent so much time trying to recreate the wheel when I first began teaching, and each time I got assigned a new course! I got fabulous ideas by attending teaching conferences (1-3 days) and by cruising websites of other instructors of my subject.
As a microbiologist, I can highly recommend the Winogradsky column (watch them change colors over the course of a semester and have students test pH, have students collect original samples from different ecosystems to start column, etc....http://helios.bto.ed.ac.uk/bto/microbes/winograd.htm).
Check into the many national chem and bio teachers orgs. They are very motivated in new methodologies of teaching (not just for high school teachers, either).
I congratulate you on your search for new methods of teaching!
2006-12-23 13:46:51
·
answer #1
·
answered by teachbio 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
although i recognize advent is authentic, i don't experience it really is going to receive a grade. regardless of the indisputable fact that, i provides you with some probable convincing arguments. advent is genuine because in case you basically analyze something as small as a cellular, it consists of a lot stuff like,cellular walls, atoms, etc. people have complicated speech,we may be able to say words and study new vocabulary. The galaxies are very complicated, each and each and every consists of distinct planets that are bunched by way of their own gravitational pull and each and each and every galaxy is apropriately sepraated from one yet another. Evolution teaches that each and each and every one this complexity arose from not something. It also teaches that we are like animals, yet animals can not experience guilt in the different case they might imagine two times about what they are going to do or sit and take into consideration about what they basically did. those skulls they got here upon, are basically standard human skulls because in case you note human beings, some have small heads, others with a large eyebrow arch, etc. the great Bang isn't genuine both because how might want to a random blast produce all the planets and galaxies era. If evolutionist can believe that the great bang got here out of nowhere and made the universe,why is it so complicated to believe that Jehovah (God), who became continuously right here, couldn't make the universe outta not something . The cellular theory isn't precise both because although sperm produce little ones, it has that species information and that would not replace over years. in my opinion, i believe neither should be rigidity-fed to all and sundry, in the journey that they don't wanna settle for the truth then it truly is their loss. i am hoping this information facilitates. P.S, the Bible reported the earth became round 1000's of years previously human beings went to the moon.
2016-10-16 21:22:59
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
You could have them compare invasive species vs the native species they replace. Bring in samples so they can get a hands-on feel for the subject. Identify their similarities and differences. Ask the big question: what makes the invasive species do so well?
2006-12-23 12:58:50
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Do debates on environmental issues. Evaluate them on how much information they gathered and as well as how rational their point of view are.
2006-12-24 06:29:04
·
answer #4
·
answered by Verves2 3
·
0⤊
0⤋