English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

...it would run the risk of being proven wrong, right?

2006-12-23 10:31:58 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

deist_lunchbox: e-mail me! I think we should talk/debate religion more

2006-12-23 10:42:25 · update #1

13 answers

Religion by definition is faith. Without faith religion is simply words. However, science is often based on theory and it is to prove the theory to be fact is what spurs on the scientist and researcher. Often they find that they are proving religious belief to be correct. Archeology is our best example. Many of the places in the Bible were considered myth until ruins were dug up in the desert.

2006-12-23 10:43:55 · answer #1 · answered by Lynn K 5 · 0 0

There is and its called Humanism, which as I understand it is a search for a natural social order without an God creating the rules. Of course it would have to ignore the possibility of a dimension which may be out of the realm of the physical. Like anything else it would run the risk of being proven right or wrong.

2006-12-23 10:50:03 · answer #2 · answered by thundercatt9 7 · 0 0

If its science ... its not religion anymore ....

Thousand years ago , people used to think that the rain were the tears of God ... it was religion , because they don't understand it.
Once they understand how the rain is made , its science .

so religion is an explication of something that you don't know. and when you will understand it , it wont be religion anymore.It a science.(Every theory must follow the scientific method to became valid as Science ).

I don't think that we will know everything in the universe , we won't find the absolute truth ...That's why there will be always"Religion "
however,i am sure that we will answer billions of question , and what is concerning religion today , will be considered as scientific fact in the future .

2006-12-23 10:58:20 · answer #3 · answered by jimy86Leb 2 · 0 0

Yes, but religions that run on faith can be scientifically proved wrong as well. But I see what you are saying. If a scientific religion with scientific-minded members was proved wrong, it would fall apart. If a faith-based religion was scientifically proved wrong it could still survive because its members would be brainwashed and indoctrinated. How else could religions like Christianity survive through the ages?

2006-12-23 10:39:26 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

A science-based religion is a self-contradictory idea. Science results from careful observation and repeatable testing under specifiable conditions. Religion is a matter of faith, of physically untestable theories.

2006-12-23 10:36:03 · answer #5 · answered by eatmorec11h17no3 6 · 1 0

A religion based on science would be kind of dull, since religion is about answering the big questions, and science is modest enough to acknowledge it doesn't have an answer for everything.

2006-12-23 10:34:03 · answer #6 · answered by Lunarsight 5 · 0 0

technology is a potential of discovery in line with information. As a race, this suggests of discovery remains in that is infancy. Our species has been in the international some 50,000 years, yet basically in the final 500 has got here across greater appropriate to the universe than in the previous 40 5,500. i do no longer think technology must be at odds with spirituality; nor faith. I do have faith that as quickly as religious ideals are at odds with awareness (like copernicus and the earth revolving around the solar as a replace of any incorrect way around) that could be a demonstration of falsity. The state of technology immediately does posit the enormous bang, and noone has any genuine thought what "preceeded" it if that query even is wise. it may be that throughout actuality lots greater spectacular than faith, or the present state of scientific awareness think of. individually, i think of spirituality and technology do no longer confict yet that maximum religions and technology do, in line with what I pronounced above. Catholics say that there could be no conflict, that in line with threat God used evolution to create human beings. even nonetheless you're able to have faith in Heaven, Jehova, Immaculate concept, starting to be from the grave on faith. i've got faith that as quickly as human beings now no longer could die - in as quickly as 50 years - religions will go through.

2016-10-28 06:10:05 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I don't think so... If it was based on science, then it would change as our understanding of science changed. For a religion not based on faith, try Deism!

2006-12-23 10:43:32 · answer #8 · answered by Byron A 3 · 1 0

Druid, Tianic and Ricci are all scientifically based faiths. They all have medicinal, herbal,Metallurgic and other similar sciences at their roots.

2006-12-23 10:55:30 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Actually, with the megatons of evidence that scientists have gathered, I'm sure it would be VERY difficult to disprove science.

2006-12-23 10:34:40 · answer #10 · answered by Cold Fart 6 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers