Nope never
but pornography is done in an ashamed way
2006-12-23 10:07:54
·
answer #1
·
answered by snuggels102 6
·
4⤊
1⤋
I’m not at all ashamed of the human body.
However, pornography presents people, mostly women, as nothing more than sex toys, objects, to be looked at for one’s sexual pleasure. We are not meant to treat each other this way. We should value every human soul, and not consider anyone as a mere object.
Any form of sex that treats the other person as a mere object is void of love and all consideration.
Another problem is that viewers of pornography often become obsessive and can’t get enough. This keeps the mind focused inward, focused on personal pleasure. Any activity that causes us to be obsessive in our self-focus is going to be destructive to you in the long run.
Pornography causes one to be selfish and self-focused, thinking only of your pleasure and taking your focus away from the considerations of others. That is why I am against it.
2006-12-23 18:23:59
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
i don't believe in a god
but i still think pornography is disgusting because even though it is natural for people to do it in their own privacy, pornography degrades both men and women and takes people down right to their primitive characteristics, and it is different than a couple having sex because pornography is a result of just sheer seeking of pleasure, i don't know how to explain it, but there's more to life than just that, and i don't understand how those who get involved in the production of pornography limit themselves to that
2006-12-23 18:58:07
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
God made the human form, but He did not make it to be shown in such a manner. Human sexuality was designed by God for procreation and for bonding between a husband and wife. Anything outside that brings shame to God's creation.
2006-12-23 18:12:39
·
answer #4
·
answered by shojo 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Gods work is to be cherished not exploited. The problem with man is he wants to exploit everything God gave him. Only a husband should see his wife naked and visa versa. Only parents or guardians should see their children naked because of all the perverts these days. Even the parents can't be trusted though. Any way. Until one gives up thier exploitating nature they can not get out of the cycle of repeated birth, deathl, old age and disease.
2006-12-23 18:10:40
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Porn is by no means a display of Gods work, its a display of sinful human pleasure, and lust.
nothing like seeing 8 people who just met Go at it as if the were animals
2006-12-23 19:34:30
·
answer #6
·
answered by WHAT?!!! 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
Our human bodies without clothing and pornography are two very different things.
Think of Micheal Angelo's "David" (big naked sculpture) and think about how that makes you feel. Then think of pornography, and think about how that makes you feel.
Did you notice how incredibly different those feelings were?
Think about it.
2006-12-23 18:49:20
·
answer #7
·
answered by daisyk 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
HINDU KAMA SUTRA HAS ONE THOUSAND ILLUSTRATIONS THAT DEPICTS HUMAN SEXUAL ACTIVITIES YET TO A PURE MIND INSPIRED BY GOD THERE IS NO PORNOGRAPHY INTENDED. IT EVEN BECOMES A GUIDE TO THOSE WHO ARE PHYSICALLY IMPAIRED WITH DEFORMITIES THAT COULD ENABLE THEM TO ENJOY SEXUAL ACTS.
THE PICTURE THAT ILLUSTRATES THE WORKS OF GOD BECOMES PORNOGRAPHY WHENEVER THE ENTERTAINER AND THE ENTERTAINED CONNIVED TO PUT MALICIOUS INTENT IN THE WORKS TO BECOME AN OBJECT OF LUST AND EVIL FANTASIES.
2006-12-23 18:29:54
·
answer #8
·
answered by Rallie Florencio C 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Not ashamed of God's works. But I do reject the perversion of God's works.
.
2006-12-23 18:22:57
·
answer #9
·
answered by PaulCyp 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
I asked a question about Ezekiel 23: 19 - 21 and was deleted. I guess you can only ask about certain verses.
2006-12-23 18:13:25
·
answer #10
·
answered by Beavis Christ AM 6
·
0⤊
0⤋