English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

4 answers

Few if any can prophesy that outcome, for prospective in the field of medical science wefts and warps: medical epiphanies or breakthroughs heavily depend on the subject at hand, the biology of human beings, and therefore have nothing truly precise, nor is medicine founded upon precision but rather malleability and change, even down to DNA, which are components that have yet scarcely expressed their entire and dormant if not miraculous potentials -- nor might DNA ever. DNA is outrageously responsive to both outer and inner change due to both internal and environmental necessity. Little in physical life is so adaptable as that of DNA.

So whatever might be the predicted advances one elucidates will at best be conjecture and speculation.

Given what medicine may have before it to work with presently, one can derive from that point, yes, but this had as easily be changed at once in a blink of an eye at a very sub-atomic level, which cannot yet be made evident to observation but nonetheless can proceed to some new function and thereby morphology and expressions and which does supplant current or popular fact and doctrine that had before been thought above reproach.

That which sets deepest highly and surely does surface and manifests much later, changing all that will have been projected before.

The proof of this is demonstrated in the influence of pharmaceuticals on human physiology, in which good indications in the present change drastically over the course of months or years, which in turn shatters an entire prospective on a class of certain chemistries, which in turn again changes the outlook for patients and thereby certain advances in medicine, speeding or slowing progress or completely scrapping the air-tight argument or advances hitherto assumed closed to further question or thought having no need of further scrutiny.

In short, all is depended on the very thing on which medicine so heavily depends -- the biological and physiological natures in the human subject itself. And this is not quite predictable; thus, how possibly can medicine predict or project?

We can import one advance, which is a considerably plausibe and very critical outer advance: this may well be in the realm of botanical medicine under the umbrella of the naturopathic model, which studies and applications will prove this does indeed align and chemically resonate most directly with the human body, with which both plants and human beings have evolved in tandem over many ages of natural evolutionary testing and trial.

2006-12-23 10:23:20 · answer #1 · answered by ? 6 · 1 0

Hopefully a cure for aids

2006-12-23 13:28:03 · answer #2 · answered by english_rose10 3 · 0 0

we probably will not know untill we update from the **ICD-9** system to the **ICD-10** system almost every country except the USA has changed over...we need to do this very soon

2006-12-23 18:35:18 · answer #3 · answered by sosickiam 4 · 0 0

AIDS and cancer research

2006-12-23 13:28:17 · answer #4 · answered by Perdida en Paris 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers