lol...they should storm the church and ship her back!
2006-12-23 01:28:00
·
answer #1
·
answered by mrfoxhorn 5
·
3⤊
1⤋
OK, brace yourselves. You aren't going to believe me when I ask this, but I swear I'm telling the truth about not knowing. I only went to church for a few family funerals when I was little, do they really have magazine racks and magazines there, or is this a joke? Seriously. I thought all they did was sing songs, eat crackers and drink grape juice, and listen to a priest talk about gods. How strange. Oh well, "strange" is par for the course for religion...
2016-05-23 01:37:17
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I actually think this is sort of funny. She is trying to get public support and she is just getting public frustration to really focus on illegals in this country. She has not changed her status. She has not changed anyones thinking on this issue. The church is being stuck with the tab of housing and feeding this woman and now gets to do the same for her dog. I don't think that the INS should bust in and take her. It is what she wants and hopes to gain publicity for her. She and her lawyers will claim abuse and a nice lawsuit will be filed against the govt on behalf of her poor son. She is hoping the suit could lead to a nice payout and she could live without working. Her son is being used with her permission to be taken around the country to plead her case. Could child protective services take the kid, I am sure they could by again that provides publicity for this woman. She is a non issue and as soon as the people using her see that they will leave her and move on to someone else. We send people with children to jail all the time and the fact that these people are parents have no standing with the court. Leave her there, she can't work, party or have her freedom. She has place herself in a jail. Let those fine upstanding chruch people pay her bills until she is old. I bet they will think hard and long before they let another one live in their church.
2006-12-23 03:37:39
·
answer #3
·
answered by cece 4
·
1⤊
2⤋
Yeah, this makes me sick. They even had an ICE roundup of deportation order dodgers, but left her there. She wouldn't even be qualified for legalization under the Senate bill since she both came illegally again AFTER being deported AND has a conviction for Social Security fraud. So what is this nonsense?
2006-12-23 02:21:31
·
answer #4
·
answered by DAR 7
·
3⤊
1⤋
Not only that she was deported twice, which coming back into the states makes you a Felon. And ICE says they aren't going in to get her, geez. Here's what ticks me off about this, remember "Elián González" remember how they stormed into the house and scared that kid? And deported him? But ICE can't go in and get this woman. puhlease.
This is another example of a criminal getting away with their crime and just because she comes from south of the border they want to say she is like Rosa Parks. She is NO where close to being a Rosa Parks.
2006-12-23 01:43:44
·
answer #5
·
answered by Hold em Rox 6
·
3⤊
1⤋
As a legal American citizen, Social Security Fraud would get you time in prison. She wants citizenship? Give it to her, then prosecute her for the fraud charges. Does the judicial system in America give "leniency" to single parents? No they don't. Why should she be let off the hook for any of this? She is using that child, sending him to D.C., to look for sympathy. She is just wrong on so many levels.
2006-12-23 01:38:59
·
answer #6
·
answered by msuzyq 4
·
4⤊
1⤋
Just because her children were born here should not automatically make them citizens. I know that is the current state of things but why should it be so? If she is here illegally then isn't her fetus also? Then just by being born presto chango it is a U.S. citizen. If we amend the laws so that the children of illegals are not automatically granted citizenship status then we could send them all packing.
2006-12-23 02:18:35
·
answer #7
·
answered by hernandoguy 2
·
4⤊
1⤋
To many people claim she has a God given right to do whatever she decides on and wants. That America must changed it's laws, they are to be overlooked to accommodate this woman.
2006-12-23 09:05:46
·
answer #8
·
answered by MinuteWoman 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I wish I was where that church was. I would have walked up in there and dragged her by her hair.
2006-12-23 13:16:36
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
I could sympathize with them, if they hadn't broken laws to get here!
2006-12-23 01:39:13
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anarchy99 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
I am an agnostic, so a church would not be a first choice.
As far as illegal immagration goes, I could care less about this issue. I tend to sympathize with them.
2006-12-23 01:29:02
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
5⤋