If evolution is outlawed, only outlaws will evolve. ;-)
2006-12-22 17:15:22
·
answer #1
·
answered by Lady of the Pink 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
There are some very obtrusive errors in that article which make its predictions incredibly suspect. before everything, the prediction curiously stems from the London college of Economics, which does no longer do any examine into evolutionary biology. On actual of that, it replaced into commissioned for a "adult adult males's satellite tv for pc television channel", no longer an tutorial learn, which throws its credibility into severe doubt. It additionally makes some very particular predictions approximately how those new species will seem, affirming that those new people might have a height of 6-7 ft, and a lifespan of a hundred and twenty years. in spite of the reality that evolutionary technology can speculate approximately wide-unfold developments that can enhance, such particular predictions, and quite the circumstances they take place, are confusing to foretell and maximum scientists do no longer lead them to (it quite is undemanding to foretell wide-unfold developments in how the climate will exchange by way of the years, working example, yet precise forecasts previous some days are in actuality impossible). It additionally makes the fairly unrealistic assumption that technologies and socioeconomic alterations will bring about biologically incompatible species. there is truthfully no real indication that it relatively is possibly, or unavoidably available, and it quite is greater and greater finding like present day technologies and society will shrink the effect of organic determination in people. The record does make the declare that present day technologies and medicines could make people much less able to struggling with off affliction, yet no person can yet are watching for the outcomes this might have over right here few millenia. In that factor, the opportunity of nanotechnology and biotechnological exchange might additionally come into play, and no-one yet knows how those will influence the image.
2016-10-15 11:50:33
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Oh yes because humanity has had SUCH a good track record of respecting those they "deem" as inferior. I'm sure the evolved humans will respect the rights of the "inferior" ones and not try to claim that they are a "superior race" and try to kill off all the non evolved species. *sarcasm alert*
2006-12-22 16:46:26
·
answer #3
·
answered by sheepinarowboat 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, that sounds like your applying a form of Social Darwinism, which is pseudoscience.
Not to mention, your selective trait (intelligence) has some genetic correlation, but not a strong one.
Selection of this multifactorial trait is unlikely to lead to significant genetic difference.
2006-12-22 16:36:32
·
answer #4
·
answered by eigelhorn 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
umm... thats a little wishful thinking and lil arrogant.
Wouldnt you be red if you found out that science was actually a means by which power is consolidated much like religion during the medieval ages..
Seriously man - what people believe doesnt make them more or less advanced socially or technologically....
dull question....
2006-12-22 16:34:57
·
answer #5
·
answered by max power 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
evolution only works if there is a reason to evolve.
humans do not need to evolve because we have reached our peak. we can make our enviroment suit us. we do not need to evolve to suit the enviroment.
2006-12-22 16:35:52
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
I think the future of man will blend all into truth
2006-12-22 16:34:06
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Already did.
Males and Females--had to evolve parallel!!!!!!!!
2006-12-22 16:39:20
·
answer #8
·
answered by whynotaskdon 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Or maybe we will de-evolve into apes again, hey if it can work one way why not the other
2006-12-22 16:33:30
·
answer #9
·
answered by Ethan M 5
·
0⤊
2⤋
This kind of evolution won't be biological, so it's impossible to say.
2006-12-22 16:34:21
·
answer #10
·
answered by Nowhere Man 6
·
1⤊
0⤋