What do you think is the motivation to make all things appear equal, unequal things equal at all costs?

Question

Doesn't this force us into lying in order to please people and not truth?
For example, would it be acceptable if we found out that whites have superior intelligence to non whites? Or would we call it racism because of rejection and dislike of that fact? I am not saying it is a fact, I am tryiing to show how people who pretend to be just ,often cover truth and are afraid of truth that reveals difference or the superiority of one thing over another.
All things must be equal, that is the orthodoxy of today, that is the religion of untruth, of the non religious.
For instance why are all religions called equal instead of being evaluated on an individual basis? Similarity does not prove equality? Some things are equal and some are not, let us be honest when one thing is better than another and not feel obligated to lie. Also a woman and man being together is different from a man and man being together, they are not the same, therefore not equal. But all we hear are lies

Especially concerning the topic of unnatural marraige, some people point to the things that may be equal like love, but that is not what I am talking about. I am talking about the very real, undeniable differences, such as the physical, biological, and physiological, that even extend to logic, mental conceptuality and linguistic rational laws of identity.These I consider very important to the mental health and psychological sanity of any just society. For if you can change the meanings of such things, upside down and to that which is backwards, what can't you change through pernicious sophistry? Can you not then change what is left to right, from right to left, and what is wrong to right and what is right to wrong? Unequal to equal?

Concerning the race issue. I am non white.
But I seek the truth, not what pleases me. If the truth and what pleases me coincide I am happy. It is just a question that questions your truthfulness. Some people are just menpleasers, not true.

On the religion issue. Just because you are unable to think things through to a final analysis does not means somebody else cannot? Again do not assume we are all equal, some people are superior to others in some things. We must always be slow to speak and quick to listen.

Political Correctness that means what is said or done for the sake of political expedience and is not necessarily true, just , or honorable. Yes UW

Answer 1

the new religion/motivation is to be SURE that no one feels bad about ANYthing...its denial of reality..
everyone IS different.....some R smarter some are funnier,some read fast/slow - athletic ability differs BUT we have started teaching kids that one must NEVER acknowledge -let alone talk- about differences AS THEY WILL be viewed as a MEAN,hateful,racial, ...etc person.
example:
A disruptive kid "s "problem" MUST BE tolerated (even if the rest of the class dont get their lessons due to the kids disruptive behavior maybe even get recess taken away because of the kid). The councillors talk to the class and ask that THEY help kid manage /work on his problem ..How would U feel??? dont be mean to the kid /tell him to stop or call him names.....
--Reality is that this kid's problem exists...BUT WE DONT WANT the kid or anyone else to think BADLY about them because they will feel angry/upset...

IT IS MAJOR DISHONESTY and the WORST thing to do..
TO function well -society MUST recognize that HUMANS are diverse and different..... humans have likes/ dislikes Humans have differernt talents and abilities...
A desire to be an athelete is fine but one must have the ability..Not all abilities can be mastered but Humans can learn many things..
JUNK- like skin color,eye shape, size, hair color etc are simply physical variations--they have nothing to do with the INDIVIDUAL'S ability,talent or thier level of determination,need etc..
Its just stupid to teach kids to find what they like enjoy, then tell them to object,rant, whine if someone else doesnt like what they like...so they grow into adults who demand their employer's BAN something because they dont like it or it offends them (i.e. i dislike having to smell perfume or scented air freshner--so NOBODY should be allowed to wear scented products (deoderant,cologne,). It is MY RIGHT to have a un-offensive workplace
...or i'm green and all the blue kids get better grades and go to college ..its unfair!!I I can get a lawyer and DEMAND EQUAL access to college-- give me $$ and acceptance even if I never bothered to study and probably will flunk out...
ME me me me and dont anyone get on my case about it because I have EQUAL rights....
LIES LIES- so no one cries when forced to examine reality...
Equality is not uniformity too bad people dont get it

Answer 2

Agreed. When will our courts and law makers realize that "we the people" want them to be smart, and not "Politically Correct" to the point of reverse discrimination?

Democrats look like they are going to be just a bad as "Bush the idiot".

Next time, lets take a big chance and vote in a few "independents";

Lou Dobbs would make an excellent President. He has already met the first test, he doesn't want to be President.

Answer 3

Yeah, we can be people pleasers. I'm not saying that's right, but it is one side of our society. Political Correctness was proposed as a positive thing, but all things can be twisted and abused and used to harm. Injustices have been committed In the name of Democracy, in the name of God, in the name everything good. Same with equality & human rights. In the name of preserving/protecting some peoples rights, the rights of others are taken away/violated.

Equality is not, in and of itself, a terrible ideal but focusing on superiority and who is more right can lead us to terrible places.

Answer 4

Another semi-intellectual post about homosexuality.

Let's be honest then. A man and a woman who are fertile are superior to a man and a woman who are infertile. A man who cannot produce sperm is simply defective... right? Obviously, according to your logic, he should be placed on notice as unable to marry?

Let's be honest. Infertile people are therefore equivalent to Gays as they cannot propogate the species. They are all defective. Then again, the gays must be less defective, because if properly motivated, they could either donate sperm or use artificial insemination and actually produce children.

That's right then... let's order things according to you.

Heterosexual couples.

Homosexual couples and heterosexual couples who don't want children.

Sterile heterosexual couples.

Avowed singles.

Does that seem OK to you?

Answer 5

hehehe! riiiiiight. that little racist "what if" is amusing and total bullfeces. by what testing method would you determine white superiority? some IQ test written and evaluated by white people?
hehehe give me a break.

religious equality exists in that everyone has the right to their religious preference. in this, in America" we're suppose to be equal. as for religious "truth", totally a personal subjective experience so ascertaining values for equality is pointless.

as for sexual partnerships. go ahead. quantify Love. devise a test whereby you can determine whether Love between one set of partners is more valid than another set.

sorry ... but you're being quite obvious in your seeking of validation for your bigotry.

Answer 6

People who believe in 'equality' just want to homogenize everyone therefore rendering them unthreatening. That's all it is brute, primal instincts: survival of the fittest. It's not profound.....the belief in equality that is. What's profound is the humility of difference.

Answer 7

Whatever ideological struggle you're dealing with exists mostly in your head, I think.