Like you say kill people in other places to save lives at home type non-sense. How can you possably justify war if you are pro-life, sounds more like pro-hypocracy to me. Ever wondered how many unborn babys where aborted with your bombing of Hiroshima? The A-bomb(Abortion bomb).
How many of you are going to tell me, yes we had to abort those Japanese babies( and burn the living born as well) to save our fighting men as well because hey, our flags red, white and blue and we love jesus?
Oh and today you Amerikkkans have a military alliance with Israil too so that get you some mentally deranged right to bomb and burn people with your revolting weapons. You have no god, there is no god but you do just love to take control of another womans womb, even if it kills her.
Thankyou, this question would be impossable to even imagine without your work and I'm counting on your creative pro-lifeofhypocracy logic to come up with an answer.
Abortion no, massive wars yes? Please explain?
2006-12-22 16:20:41 · 25 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
They're "pro life" until the baby is born - then, they do not support anything that will help children and their families - not national health insurance, not increased public aid for mothers and children, not more funding for day care, not higher salaries for teachers, not bigger budgets for public schools ect - and they don't support anything that will help preserve the lives of adults - that's why they're pro death penalty and pro war!
2006-12-22 16:23:35 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 5⤋
Ever think about how many American babies were allowed to have a life by their fathers not having to die in a long drawn out extened war !! We didn`t start the damn war !! Why don`t you ask the relatives of the 2600 + victims of Pearl Harbor ? Why don`t you ask the relatives of the 2600 + victims of the 9/11 ?? Why don`t you ask the older generation of Europe who had their asses saved from hitler in WW2 ?? When you find there is cancer , you start treatment , you don`t let it run wild until it kills you , when you have the ability to cure it !! Ask the Kurds how they feel about it !! You`re probalbly alive today because an American soldier fought your battles for you , and your parents or grand-parents were saved !! If you don`t value the freedom you have , next time fight your own battles !!
2006-12-22 16:43:20 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I am a pro-lifer who doesn't want to control another womans body. I want her to control it herself with something novel called "Birth Control". And if that doesn't work out, there's another concept called "Accepting your womanhood". If raising a child is inconvenient, untimely, etc. there is another concept called adoption. The last time I checked, there was an uncanny equal amount of couples trying to adopt, as there were baby people being killed by their own mothers.
There is no comparison to killing innocent babies with killing terrorists who would cut your throat in a heartbeat honey. There are too many excuses for the former, and no good one for the latter. Wake up and smell your freedom.
2006-12-22 17:00:00 · answer #3 · answered by Mandalawind 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
it relatively is a undemanding question right here, and tremendously lots around the board you will get solutions saying that an unborn infant is harmless, at the same time as a dying row inmate has performed something to "deserve" dying. in spite of the shown fact that, now and back the criminal gadget gets it incorrect. interior the final 30 years interior the U.S. on my own, over one hundred people have been released from dying row through fact they have been exonerated via DNA info. those are people who have been got here upon to blame "previous a useful doubt." regrettably, DNA info isn't available in maximum circumstances. So, as long through fact the dying penalty is in place, you're tremendously lots sure to often execute an harmless person. How can every person be happy with that?
2016-10-15 11:49:53 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
everwonder how many more of us would have been killed without the defensive use of the A-bomb ? Defending ones life is not as hypocritical as your accusation .
gain some sense the psycho- babble is self emasculating in case you didn't realize you can do much better if you allow yourself the natural right of critical thought rather than mindless parroting but if you actually believe this drivel so be it ...It takes all kinds even specious arguement has it's place .
peace out
2006-12-22 16:30:29 · answer #5 · answered by dogpatch USA 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Because somethings are worth dying for.Freedom to think the way you do is not free.If people did not fight wars this country,and world for that matter,would not exist,we would still be under the rule of Kings(dictators) and would be a lot worse off then we are now.
As for your obvious Muslim/Anti-Semite views of Israel,and Pro-Neo-Nazi political stance I will not stoop to that level.All I will say about your views is a lot of good men and woman DIED,so you could think and express them.
2006-12-22 16:31:31 · answer #6 · answered by david b 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Why do you think all pro-life people have the same beliefs? I am Christian and I am pro-life but not pro-war. War sucks. Jesus saves. Have a merry Christmas.
2006-12-22 16:42:45 · answer #7 · answered by I love Jesus! 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm not a supporter of abortions, but I am far from pro-war; I hate war.
2006-12-22 16:40:31 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Wars are bad they kill a lot of people. Abortion is wrong it also
kills. The two are not conected in any way.
2006-12-22 16:26:52 · answer #9 · answered by chris 2 · 3⤊ 0⤋
I am Pro Life, Anti War, and Happy to Be Alive. Shouldn't you be the same?
2006-12-22 16:22:17 · answer #10 · answered by karencherico 1 · 3⤊ 2⤋
To paraphrase George Orwell;
"Some life is more sacred than others"
btw you forgot capital punisment.
2006-12-22 19:11:22 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋