The first one is,'due to global warming ,the average temperature of the earth is increasing and in coming years it ll be very high to collapse the human system'.The other one is'the heat of the sun is reducing very slowly and it ll create super cooling on the earth,which ll collapse the human system .'Which one of the two out of theabove two statements is correct?
2006-12-22 14:56:25 · 6 answers · asked by shree30 1 in Environment
Neither statement is known to be true. The earth is currently warming, but the effects will probably not be enough to cause human extinction.
The sun is not reducing or cooling in any noticeable way. The Sun will go through a red-giant stage (and incinerate the Earth) long before it burns out; but that is several hundred million years from now.
2006-12-23 19:23:59 · answer #1 · answered by Keith P 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They are both false.
Humans are masters of the environment. While it may be prudent to stem global warming, man COULD damage the ecosystem and deal with the results. They will not likely result in a "collapse" of society. However, according to a report put out and released by Tony Blair (PM of the UK), the effects of global warming will result in a global GDP reduction of 20%, or $7,000,000,000,000 a year. As the report put it, that would be comparable to living in the World Wars or the Great Depression.
The second statement is true. The sun is essentially fueled by hydrogen nuclear fusion. Hydrogens turn into helium, releasing energy. Once all the hydrogen is helium, no fuel with be left. Earth's biotic system will collapse. However this takes place beyond standard geologic time scales. In other words, don't worry.
2006-12-22 16:33:44 · answer #2 · answered by justin_at_shr 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Whether global warming is true or not, one thing is for sure. We need an alternative to the internal combustion engine due to the fact that OPEC and the "powers that be" are raping us daily. Hydrogen fuel cells are a very viable option, but too many people (in Washington?) are against it.
Anyway, this would cut our greenhouse gasses extensively.
2006-12-22 16:27:24 · answer #3 · answered by Delta Charlie 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
My name is Rafael Lomena. I write from Alicante (Spain). I am independent investigator on the Accelerated Global Heating and want to share with all something that can turn out from interest to fight this phenomenon.
I believe that the main cause of the Accelerated Global Heating is in the great and increasing forest fires that are whipping to the planet in the last years.
My complete report is in: http://inicia.es/de/rlv/clim.htm...
If they do not understand the Spanish they can use the automatic translator that will find in the main page of site:
http://inicia.es/de/rlv
Thanks to all.
(* This message has been translated with a translation software)
2006-12-24 08:44:19 · answer #4 · answered by ELPATRON 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
global warming as the word suggest is-----is that the temperature of the world is gradually being increased yearly and due to it the polar ice caps melts...as a result sea levels rise etc etc....
the other though statements is not 'global warming'...though i`m aware of your second statements it would take thousands of years at least to conform that fact and thats is what the scientist in this field also has to say...
2006-12-22 15:03:01 · answer #5 · answered by toby 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The first one is pure nonsense. The second one is going to happen in a few billion years . Is your life insurance paid up ?
2006-12-22 15:02:14 · answer #6 · answered by Shark 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋