2006-12-22 10:58:52 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
The main point evolutionists seem to want people to believe is that man evolved from a common ancestor with the primates. There is no scientific proof of man evolving from primates. It is said that it's a theory that shows how it might have happened, that it's a fact that it did happen, but that it's not known how and the "theory" just helps explain how it did happen. The jargon is deceiving, else how is it that kids graduating from high school leave believing that they descended from apes. There is not one bit of scientific evidence that one species evolved out of or into another. If man had evolved from a common ancestor with the apes then there would be scientific evidence all over creation of species that were proven to have evolved from one another.
2006-12-22 11:13:51 · answer #1 · answered by hisgloryisgreat 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Yes, most animals share common parts with many other animals that do not work, they work in other animals, but they do not work in certain specieis. This alone, unless a designer specifically made very uneconomical bodies is proof of macro evolution.
Really, I could name about a thousand pieces of evidence that lead to a pretty convincing PROOF>
2006-12-22 11:05:11 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
Evolution is a fact. A fact occurs when there's too much evidence to say otherwise. This is exactly the case with Evolution.
2006-12-22 11:06:53 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
"Proof" is a tricky word. I would say, no, there is no proof... but there is a whole shload of evidence that supports the conditions that would exist if evolution has actually occurred.
It doesn't take a genius to see that evolution has and continues to occur.
2006-12-22 11:03:10 · answer #4 · answered by ChooseRealityPLEASE 6 · 4⤊ 2⤋
Science does not deal in proof, it deals in evidence.
There are millions of pieces of evidence that support the Theory of Evolution.
2006-12-22 11:01:33 · answer #5 · answered by Snark 7 · 9⤊ 2⤋
"Scientific proof" is an oxymoron. Science is about providing evidence, and what we are to believe is that for which there is the best evidence.
Needless to say, there is abundant evidence for evolution.
2006-12-22 11:02:15 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 7⤊ 2⤋
a 10th grade biology book can answer better than I can on the specifics.
but in short,Yes there is a huge ammount of evidence to support the theory of Evolution.
2006-12-22 11:03:33 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 2⤋
I'm waiting for someone to say that evolution is "just a theory," as if that refutes it. Now it IS a theory, but saying that it is does NOT make it invalid.
2006-12-22 11:03:37 · answer #8 · answered by I'm Still Here 5 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Tons of evidence. It's also a working scientific model. Without it we wouldn't have our new generations of antibiotics.
2006-12-22 11:11:12 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
how about human fetus having gills ..
dolphin fetus having buds where there were once feet ...
the list is endless sorry ...
and i say this as one who believes in God
but i am not silly enough to ignore evidence
2006-12-22 11:04:35 · answer #10 · answered by Peace 7 · 3⤊ 2⤋