2006-12-22 10:55:27 · 33 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
There is not a single shred of evidence that would be accepted in a scientific laboratory.
Whoever "thumbs-downed" me, feel free to e-mail me with the evidence, if you think I'm wrong, because I would LOVE to hear it.
2006-12-22 10:57:57 · answer #1 · answered by . 7 · 7⤊ 5⤋
If u stay tuned to National Geographic and the Discovery Channel u would know that there have been expeditions where scientists have proven that there was a great deluge (flood) that coincides with the biblical period of time and that an expedition found boards of wood that come from the area where Noah supposedly lived and had built the ark on the mountain where the ark hit dry land in Arafat or Ararat sorry for the spelling don't know how to spell it correctly but there have been other things that science proved like the big boom of the beginning of the world. Stay tuned and see or check out some websites on science proving the bible. There's also the fact that man has one less rib than women do.
2006-12-22 11:11:59 · answer #2 · answered by papabeartex 4 · 0⤊ 4⤋
Well, the single atom thought to be the spark for the Big Bang had to come from somewhere and science has yet to find solid proof of where that might have been :)
So Yes and No :)
2006-12-22 11:00:49 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Why don't you do a google search and find out. Is there any Proof to Evolution, that is up for debate as well. You can say that yeah they made it happen in a bottle with the right conditions but the problem is "they" made it happen. The probability is astronomical of it actually happening on it's own with no outside help. So both sides lack the evidence that they need in order to fully prove their sides. There still is a missing link, and I don't think it will ever be found honestly. You have to tear everything apart and decide for yourself.
2006-12-22 11:02:51 · answer #4 · answered by WINGS 4 · 0⤊ 4⤋
No, not really. But there is personal proof, it is called a visit from the Holy Spirit who will witness to you mentally, emotionally, and even physically within your body.
If you ever need that proof of your eternal life, just e- mail me. Or, go into a small church in a poor neighborhood. Then find the happiest person in the room and ask them how you can chat with God and receive a visit from the Holy spirit.
Why a small poor church? The only thing they can afford is the Holy spirit. -- enough said?
2006-12-22 11:02:36 · answer #5 · answered by MrsOcultyThomas 6 · 2⤊ 3⤋
There are scientific and spiritual proofs for both theists and atheists.
Men with partial vision cannot see the proofs.
The atom is supposed to be visible, but not all mankind can see it. I have not seen the atom myself, but I believe its existence through the learners of physics and the spiritual Educators.
The soul is considered as invisible, but I believe its existence through the learners of religions and the Divine Messengers of God.
2006-12-22 11:09:10 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Well-- YEAH! I mean there's all this STUFF! And it's really complicated. I mean, I sure don't understand it. Okay, maybe other stuff could've made it, but then who made that other stuff, huh? And who made the who that made THAT stuff? It can't just happen!
Look, it's very simple. See my watch? It's got gears and stuff inside it. Let me just open it up here. Hmm, it seems to be-- there! Okay, now look inside. See all those-- OMG, where are the gears? Somebody took the gears out of my watch!
2006-12-22 11:04:22 · answer #7 · answered by skepsis 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I was thinking about this issue the other day and I came to realize something very important that I never thought about in relation to this issue before: all evidence is subjective.
Those who choose not to believe in God often claim that they have lots of evidence that God doesn't exist and so forth. I believe that people like this believe that they are being more objective by not basing their beliefs on faith. But they are not being objective.
This is true because of the way our human experience is set up. We all receive information through our senses. All typical human learning is done through perception of some kind. We feel, we see, we hear, but all of that information goes through our perception systems in our minds before we interpret it as evidence of something. Even when we use scientific instruments to detect things that our senses cannot detect directly, such as scanning electron microscopes, it still requires perception on the part of the person who then looks at the picture or reads the report and then interprets it. So there is a chance that, no matter how objective we are trying to be, our perception is significantly changing the way we interpret the world. And therefore, nothing that is called "scientific evidence" is truly objective.
So, in answer to your question, I have proof based on faith that God created the world. And you may claim that you have scientific evidence that says it was not created by God. But any evidence you have is subjective, and therefore just as valid as mine.
By the way, the entire world and everything in it is evidence that there is a God, if you are willing to see it. And the Holy Spirit can confirm that to you, like Uncle Wayne said.
2006-12-22 11:04:04 · answer #8 · answered by drshorty 7 · 0⤊ 5⤋
Nary a shred. All the evidence is in contradiction to creationism.
2006-12-22 11:14:07 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Steven: Men and women have the same number of ribs.
Now, as for evidence of creation, all you can go by is speculation---for the most part. I mean, you really can't find evidence that we are all descended from a naked couple living in a garden somewhere.
2006-12-22 10:59:22 · answer #10 · answered by I'm Still Here 5 · 7⤊ 2⤋
Well, science doesn't deal in proof, but in evidence...
And no, there's no evidence for creationism, either.
There's just, "I have an idea, and it sounds good, so lets teach it. Yay me."
2006-12-22 11:02:17 · answer #11 · answered by Snark 7 · 3⤊ 2⤋