I believe it is.
2006-12-22 09:58:20
·
answer #1
·
answered by Its Hero Dictatorship 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
"with a conjoined twin" You used the word 'a' & 'twin' meaning one - so the answer is NO! the third person (one of the twins) was just there. Maybe she/he was watching. If they don't participate, you had sex with just one person. What is it about you he/she didn't like?
2006-12-22 10:05:58
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
The admired "Siamese" twins Chang and Eng featured in Ripley's have faith it or no longer and Ringling Brothers' and Barnum and Bailey circus each and each had separate better halves, and that i do no longer think of every person ever noted as their encounters orgies. it quite is in basic terms a threesome if all 3 persons are fiddling with one yet another. refer to the twins approximately how they opt to habit a relationship that could contain a sexual ingredient. they are almost sure to have reported it with one yet another, and understand how they opt to manage it.
2016-10-15 11:18:42
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
SURE BUT YOU HAVE TO HAVE SEX WITH BOTH OF THEM FOR IT TO BE CONSIDERED A THREESOME.
2006-12-22 10:01:10
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
It is incest. conjoined twin is your brother or sister.
2006-12-22 09:59:10
·
answer #5
·
answered by Rammohan 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
what a creative mind you have, yes it would be a threesome. good job!!
2006-12-25 14:52:29
·
answer #6
·
answered by togetheradecade 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Including you yes. Not including you no.
2006-12-22 09:59:19
·
answer #7
·
answered by Kyle c 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
yep
2006-12-22 12:12:34
·
answer #8
·
answered by musty118 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I hope so, cause thats what I tell all my friends...
2006-12-22 09:58:19
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
ya, but isn't it just better to get two girls
2006-12-22 09:59:25
·
answer #10
·
answered by Katleen F 2
·
0⤊
0⤋