But how does one explain such a huge security lapse?? One of the prime accuse muslims was working for the US army. He had taken numerous trips to Afganistan and his higher ups were aware of his connections with radical islamic groups there. This is something i heard in Nat Geo.
Also the fact that CIA had complete knowledge of the plan, but it was rubbished as impossible. How can they be so casual?? One of the most important agencies of the most powerful country in the world. How could they let it pass when 3 of the main accused were under close surveilance for almost a year prior to the tragic event??
2006-12-22 07:59:59 · 15 answers · asked by tornjeansandguitar 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
This explains it
http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military_law/1227842.html
2006-12-23 07:52:00 · answer #1 · answered by Sir J 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
for the same reason some college toddler sneak in lighter into planes or scissors. for the same reason human beings were waiting to get with the help of safe practices perpetually. CIA did have information, yet they have mountains of alternative files besides. So that's no person-friendly pastime determining which ones to act on with restricted adult males power even although 911 proved intelligence/gov did fail. those at the on the spot are not the basically terrorists they are monitoring and its not that user-friendly as human beings choose it to be. It replaced into difficulty with severe delight between severe score intelligence officials ignoring warnings made with the help of 'little human beings' and under no circumstances prepared to company with one yet another. They knew some thing replaced into occurring like with many different terrorists they music perpetually, yet they did not have clue they'd fly planes into homes.
2016-12-01 02:23:30 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Pshaw. The CIA had WAY more important things to do than look after little fish like these arab guys. Don't you know we were fighting a War on Drugs? That war takes up a lot of manpower. It's all about priorities.
2006-12-22 08:10:58 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
Not enough communication between the various intelligence agencies.
The lack of belief that such a daring plan could ever work.
Laxity of airline security.
2006-12-22 08:10:05 · answer #4 · answered by Sean 7 · 4⤊ 1⤋
i am certain that very few people even understand what you are talking about, however, getting the word out is good any way you can. kudos.
i saw this movie on googe where this guy goes into department stores where lines of t.v.'s are showing the same thing, and he films himself slipping a dvd of "loose change" into the system and films droves of people become glued to the televisions....
2006-12-22 08:07:26 · answer #5 · answered by dude s 2 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Sandy Berger agrees with you.
He stole and destroyed documents to protect Clinton from the 9/11 Commission Investigation.
He believes that Clinton was involved.
He now has even me wondering....
2006-12-22 08:04:49 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋
I GUESS THE SAME WAY THE INTELLIGENCE AGENCIES OF THE UNITED STATES, THE UNITED NATIONS, GREAT BRITAIN, FRANCE, GERMANY, RUSSIA, ISRAEL, WERE ALL SUPPOSEDLY WRONG ABOUT WMD. ALL THESE NATIONS WITH ALL DIFFERENT AGENDAS ALL CAME UP WITH THE SAME CONCLUSION AND THEY WERE WRONG. IF YOU ACCEPT THAT (AND APPARENTLY A LOT OF LIBS SWALLOWED IT) THEN ONE MISTAKE BY ONE AGENCY ISN'T SO HARD TO BELIEVE IS IT?
2006-12-22 08:11:41 · answer #7 · answered by Rich S 4 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Bro, I think is time for you to change the air in your head.
Drugs are bad, Mmkay!!!
2006-12-22 12:36:34 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Maybe you should be asking, why do the Libs not want to do anything to protect us from the next terror attack? They are selling Americans for their own political power.
2006-12-22 08:09:15 · answer #9 · answered by me 4 · 3⤊ 3⤋
OK, let's say it wasn't an "inside job."
2006-12-22 18:04:33 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋