just being charitable doesn't mean that one can handle a country.
2006-12-25 00:22:36
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
I doubt she would have wanted a country to control in the first place. She was out there helping people directly and seemed to love that. Had she wanted to control a country she wouldn't have gotten that chance because she was a woman. They would never have made her pope. Christianity is a sexist religion.
2006-12-21 18:55:30
·
answer #2
·
answered by undir 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Mother Teresa did exactly what God wanted her to do. Care for the poor and dying. She was not asked by God or man to control a country. Bless her beautiful heart.
2006-12-21 18:54:16
·
answer #3
·
answered by winkcat 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
as **** your question may be Mother Teresa is dead and gone and that should be the state of her reign as well .obviously some have no idea of mother Teresa's value system! no offense but your kind of thinking is what the world needs to change.
Peace out and good tidings ......and have happy hooya!
2006-12-21 19:29:09
·
answer #4
·
answered by dogpatch USA 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Even if she's offered leadership for a country, she would decline it. She has such a big heart that doing the simplest and smallest act of kindness made her contented.
2006-12-21 19:08:15
·
answer #5
·
answered by citrusy 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
she never wanted control of a country
2006-12-21 18:53:56
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
She didn't want a country, she wanted to help the poorest of the poor.
2006-12-21 18:54:17
·
answer #7
·
answered by michinoku2001 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
Her interest was not politics, it was the poor and she had enough to keep her busy.
2006-12-21 18:59:45
·
answer #8
·
answered by The professor 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
She lived in a spiritual country.Peace!!
2006-12-21 18:55:09
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Do you honestly think she would have accepted? That is NOT what she was all about
2006-12-21 18:58:04
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋