the one who is defending the country. Anyone who acts in self defense, or the defense of others is always just. The one who watches pornography is just trying to fulfull their own sick needs.
2006-12-21 18:26:37
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
There are many things that need to be taken into consideration. How many innocent people does the "defender" kill? Is he really defending something from an actual danger or is he "defending" the country from a potential future danger that might or might not happen? Perhaps "defending" the country because a high ranking official says it needs to be defended although there is no real danger? All this matters. As for the one who watches the pornography, it matters what kind of pornography it is. Is it legal and made by consenting adults only, or does it have children or other non-consenting people or animals in it or otherwise illegal material?
Someone who truly is defending his people from a real danger is in my opinion more noble than the one watching porn, but if there is no real danger or a lot of innocent people getting killed I don't see anything noble about it and although there is nothing particularly noble about watching porn, watching porn that has only consenting adults in it doesn't harm anyone while killing and injuring people and ruining homes for a bullshit cause does. The latter would be worse under those circumstances.
2006-12-22 02:41:07
·
answer #2
·
answered by undir 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Pornography is selfish pleasure degrading the other into an object.
Defending one's country may take twists and turns that are judged by history, but selfish pleasure is seldom one of them.
2006-12-22 02:27:07
·
answer #3
·
answered by Joe Cool 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
The one defending the country. Definitely.
2006-12-22 02:25:43
·
answer #4
·
answered by Jenise 3
·
2⤊
0⤋
i seriouslyy hope your not trying to compare a pervert to someone serving for our country. you have had hundreds of thousands of people die for you to live in this country in the house your sitting in typing up these extremely ignorant sophomoric questions that the only reason you can make these kinds of questions is because they died defending you freedoms such as freedom of speech and you want to try and compare the noble act they went through that you couldn't even imagine how horrific the events were to someone who sits on their computer looking at porn. people like you are the reason i weep for the lives lost instead of celebrating what they saved because people like you take that in vain. you should feel completely ashamed of yourself for calling yourself an American and making a comparison like this. i hope you seriousl rethink your outlook on what has been given up for you to be reading this right now.
2006-12-22 02:36:15
·
answer #5
·
answered by harrison b 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
I don't see the connection. Are you referring to soldiers? Because they seem to collect a lot of pin-up girls.
Or are you referring to the President? He's kinda messing up a lot in the "Defending the Country" department. Are you saying the President watches porn?
What's your point?
2006-12-22 02:27:20
·
answer #6
·
answered by Psyleet 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
What if that person does both? Anyway, that is a very leading question that is too obviously slanted towards the latter.
2006-12-22 02:28:49
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Ummmmmm?
2006-12-22 02:25:14
·
answer #8
·
answered by Infidel 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
Those are the two choices? We don't get C: guy working at a homeless shelter?
And it's "Who's" as in "who is" not "whose" as in "whose porn is this?"
2006-12-22 02:24:56
·
answer #9
·
answered by Laptop Jesus 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
Please define noble in the context of this question?
Technically both parties are defending freedom of speech/expession--but in different ways.
2006-12-22 02:28:57
·
answer #10
·
answered by rawalt17 2
·
1⤊
1⤋