2006-12-21 17:43:22 · 6 answers · asked by Barabas 5 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
so wait are you saying bush is intelligent enough to plot 9/11 or that mary was truly impregnated by god?
2006-12-21 17:52:02 · answer #1 · answered by god_of_the_accursed 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
The Holy Bible,filled with prophecy and divinely inspired wisdom, does not speak or define things this way . It does not use such language as knocked up nor does it contain this as a teaching, that God had sex, which is implied in your words. so where did you get this choice of words from?
It is more reasonable to believe that God performed a miracle , a sign and wonder for our benefit, since there are trees. Trees being just one evidence of miracles, that you observe everyday and so perhaps can undersatand better, there are others.
What is harder to believe that life jsut accidently happened , or that where there is a creation there is a Creator? ro what is more reasonable?That a miracle was performed by itself or that it was performed by God? Evolution is virgin birth as well
If it happened once , why not again?
2006-12-21 17:59:56 · answer #2 · answered by Socinian F 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Of course it is more believable that Bush engineered 9/11. I certainly don't believe the second part.
2006-12-21 17:47:40 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
It is fascinating how desperately you fight against faith. One must presume from such that you recognize its reality in general, but arre absorbed by the effort to deny it individually.
2006-12-21 17:44:44 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
bush doesn't have the brains and i ques Joseph didn't have the balls loose loose situation
2006-12-21 18:00:42 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
it is believable if it's not fiction
2006-12-21 17:48:02 · answer #6 · answered by Pisces 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋