I said" How does science unequivocally prove there is no God? "?

Answer 1

I doesn't, it isn't even trying to

Answer 2

It is impossible to prove a negative. The burden of proof is on those who believe that a god exists. What science does is explore and postulate on 'explanations' for whatever knowledge pursuit is involved. There is no proof that a god exists, therefore, science can discount the hearsay evidence of supposed witnesses, mainly because they were all believers anyway. You only see believers who suddenly see the image of the supposed mother of their savior, who, by the way, never had her picture taken, so we don't really know what she looked like, only what some have speculated she may have looked like. Very rarely will a true skeptic have a "religious moment of clarity" and suddenly believe that there is an invisible being who is all powerful but couldn't stop Adam and Eve from eating forbidden fruit.

Answer 3

How do you know you that know anything. Every thought that goes through your head is based on the first assumption that because you think you are, you are. An assumption nonetheless - even if you never heard of it this way, maybe you wondered something why you watch the Matrix for the first time - how do I know this is all real?

Even God as infinite and all powerful - is not aware of what was before Him (if there was) or what is beyond Him, (if there is)

He has no definition but simply says "I am"
-
Science has never proved anything but instead through repition, variation. and predictablity, we build confidence in theorms.

"Unequivocally prove" means no assumptions, not even that you exist in a material sense.

Answer 4

It doesn't. It can't. Science should be (used to be) the art of trying to understand how God put this whole thing together. How stuff works. That kind of science totally interests me. However, some people many years ago lumped evolution into a science class and it sometimes makes me feel like I have to take it all or leave it. I just want the evolution stuff out. It should be taught in a theology class.

Answer 5

a) You cannot prove a negative.
b) If you could prove God, then the proof, the creator of the proof, and the validator of the proof would all be greater than God. You establish an endless oxymoron.
It is fascinating how desperately you fight against faith. One must presume from such that you recognize its reality in general, but arre absorbed by the effort to deny it individually?

Answer 6

Scientific method cannot prove that there is no god. Nor can any reasonable proof be given that there is one.

Any person who has developed their powers of rational and logical thinking can objectively agree to both of these things.

That same rational thinking person, if having studied the bible, suggests that the God of Abraham is truly the Creator- has become delusional.

Answer 7

It doesn't

however the bible doesn't unequivocally prove that there is a god

Answer 8

Science can scientifically prove that there is no Scientific God, that is god that can withstand scientific skepticism.
But Metaphysics means "beyond physics" for a reason. Just because there is no God that fits their criteria does not mean there is no god.

Answer 9

It doesn't science deals with the natural world, God would fall under supernatural provided God existed. This question is inherently wrong

Answer 10

God created science.

Answer 11

Impossible