Will President Bush support our troops by making sure they are properly equipped?

Question

Soldiers need body armor, humvees need bullet proofing, tanks and other mobile equpment is worn, parts are in short supply.
Shouldn't we equip the troops we have in battle already before we try to put more troops in the field?
How will we properly equip 25,000 more troops?

Answer 1

Do people ask educated questions anymore? Do people honestly think that just because the media doesn't show it, the Armed Forces don't take care of their own? Wow. Straight wow. It's been months since I've seen anybody that hasn't had body armor. Everyday I see HMMWV's roll out of the shop with new armor. These are things we've been working on here for years already. If you don't believe me simply because CNN won't back me up, then you can get over here and see for yourself.

Answer 2

A lack of body armor hasn't been a significant problem since maybe early 2004. The few exceptions were more to do with people with really odd sizes. Even units in Kuwait had body armor with SAPI plates in '04.

Most of the tanks are sitting in the US. Brigades that trained to go to battle with tanks have deployed with little more than HMMWVs because the mission doesn't call for a lot of tanks.

The problem with adding more troops isn't so much about equiping them as it will be with getting them NCOs and officers.

Answer 3

The fielding of IBA (Interceptor Body Armor) was complete to all units in Iraq in Feb 2004. The reason it took this long was that it was difficult to mass-produce SAPI plates. (Thank Clinton for scrapping our military infrastructure to the point where we had to build new factories in order to provide body armor for the troops and hard armor for the vehicles.)

The person to blame here is Clinton. This is the person who sold the factories and laid-off the workers.

BTW - about all that stuff that Reagan bought. It is now 20 Years Old and wearing out!

Answer 4

Georgy, is a splash too busy presently...he has tousled each and every thing that he has touched. He will no longer be able to verify why. possibly it quite is through fact he has too many puppeteers who knew that he would possibly in no way exert sufficient power or self belief to undertaking them. you elect somebody in charge...seem in the back of the curtain. He surely won't admit whilst he's incorrect. Signing the invoice might lead us all to end that he admits he made a super mistake sending us into the war. Thereby, we'd additionally end that he decieved us deliberatley so as that he ought to "capture" the oil. What a shame! I surely wish that the yank public elects a president that has a real spine and restores some dignity to usa. basically my opinion...Our troops which incorporate my Grandfather, Father and brothers fought for freedoms in usa, a number of those boys died for our right to particular our ideas and that i do take exhilaration in it! manage our troops with admire...they deserve that lots and greater! God bless the troops and their households

Answer 5

They are properly equipped. At least the soldiers I've talked to are - I'm sure there are exceptions, but I live in a military town and we just had a lot of men and women return from Iraq. Everyone I've talked to has told me that these rumors are highly exaggerated, but who knows? Maybe they just had the best supplies. I don't know. But I *do* know that our military should NEVER be left underfunded.

Answer 6

They do need equipment, but that is not up to Bush. Congress has denied bills trying to get more protection for our troops, which Bush has been supporting.

Answer 7

What did Reagan do with all those billions he put into the military?

Answer 8

I DONT REALLY KNOW BUT ALLS I CAN SAY IS BUSH ROCKS!!

Answer 9

Y E S!!!!!!