Can't he send more to speed it up? Isn't 3000 a victory enough?
2006-12-21 10:24:40 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Military
your right,, dont get me wrong i feel sorry for all the soldiers that died and are suffering as we write, but this was not a war that is defending our country it is only defending personal interests and a bunch of secrets that we will never know.. Now to all those politicians if they so highly believe in this massacre why dont they send their sons and daughters, huh? hell no they wont cuz their kids will be partying and getting drunk while these soldiers are being ripped aprt.
2006-12-21 10:38:10 · answer #1 · answered by CHICANALAW 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
How many times are you going to ask the same question?!?!?
Here's the same answer:
And what's your marvelous plan? Just pull out now, and leave an unstable government behind? Proving yet again that America can't handle a fight? Iran is showing signs of wanting to get rid of their hard-line government. A premature withdrawal from Iraq would most likely send the message that democracy can't work in the Middle East.
Our armed forces are all volunteer. Re-enlistment is up - the very people who are getting shot at, running the gauntlet of IEDs daily, watching their friends die, these very same people believe enough in what they are doing to re-enlist. Who the hell are you to question them?
2006-12-21 18:31:51 · answer #2 · answered by Jadis 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
That seems like quite the controversial question the way you worded it don't you think? They are soldiers by the way and being a soldier means you may be killed.
so a bush victory = as many as it takes to keep our azzes safe from future attacks and our country free
Party on Hippy!
2006-12-21 18:36:33 · answer #3 · answered by slimtrader88 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
you know, this is even the wrong question to be asking. Its not "Bush's War", its an American War if you want to classify it by possesion. We should be glad that we have the President that we do, instead of someone like Al Gore or John Kerry in office; or worse -- Ralph Nader. Be glad that theres a President that is mn enough to stand up to the powers that have bullied, provoked, taunted and prodded the USA for years and say "No more".
Be glad there are people like Bush, or those in the armed forces, to protect you and give you the right to ask your stupid questions and give your slanted opinions.
2006-12-21 18:45:32 · answer #4 · answered by solidstateonline 2 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Unfortunately for pundits like you, victory isn't measured with numbers of attrition. It's measured in milestones. You should be thankful that hundreds of thousands of Americans volunteer to keep your freedom alive and well so you can mock their sacrifices (some of them quite ultimate) with such disregard. Have you stopped to determine what victory in this case really means? Worse, have you really considered what failure really means? You might want to chew on that some, because it's reality we live in. The United States doesn't live in a protective bubble. We earn our freedom and protection with the blood of our noble volunteers.
2006-12-21 18:30:58 · answer #5 · answered by CPT Jack 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
The only reason why there are 3000 dead is because we cant just go and kill like we used to. We have alot of rules to follow and the bad guys have no rules to follow.
2006-12-21 18:29:01 · answer #6 · answered by Koolaid1730 3 · 4⤊ 1⤋
Bush will never have Victory. Never! Iraq is a lost cause. We are going down in shame. Like Vietnam.
2006-12-21 18:39:06 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 2⤋
You should be placed on the front line with a cap gun!
2006-12-21 18:27:42 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Um...you just asked this one and I'm pretty sure I answered it...
2006-12-21 18:27:20 · answer #9 · answered by Squawkers 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I don't think he's planning on stopping until there's 5,000 dead.
FP
2006-12-21 18:27:05 · answer #10 · answered by F. Perdurabo 7 · 2⤊ 4⤋