atheist: There is not enough evidence to show that there are weapons of mass destruction in Iraq.
Christian: But there is a lack of evidence to support the claim that there is not enough evidence of WMD in Iraq so obviously there are WMDs in Iraq.
Is that how GW Bush proved it.
2006-12-21 08:54:06 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
That is how they proved Something back in the 70's. My mind is drawing a blank. It was Rumsfeld and Cheney too, that is the ironic part. Oh, that Russia had nuclear subs that we could not detect. The CIA said that they had no info on this and the reply was "see how stealthy they are? This proves it!" or words to that effect. And they both got rich on defense contracts....
Here it is:
2006-12-21 09:11:37 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
bad logic both ways.
There was certainly evidence of weapons of mass destruction. Remeber that S. H> was playing "hide the ball" and even said on TV that he would use chemical and biological weapons if we invaded.
The fact that he is a liar and a simp is irrelevant. We had evidence and every reason to believe there was. Everyone in the world believed it. Not just the US. Additionally records were found showing that France, Russia, and Germany were selling biological, chemical, and nuclear components to his government so that he could produce such items. It is what caused one of the first UN mass firings after the invasion. The weapons instead of food for oil corruption.
I think you simply are using bad info. Your logic is faulty as it has a begged question.
2006-12-21 16:59:25 · answer #2 · answered by epaphras_faith 4 · 2⤊ 3⤋
I like your thinking. The way you put it would really make God believers dumbfounded. That's a thumbs up for you.
However, there is no lack of evidence to show that God exists.
ONE problem is, (I assume), many atheists have been disillusioned by the false teachings of false religions. I do hope someday you will come to the accurate knowledge of the truth. so that this truth will set you free. (John 8:32) as i was!
2006-12-21 17:08:31 · answer #3 · answered by Tomoyo K 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Don't blame GW Bush's flawed logic on all Christians. It's neither here nor there, one has nothing to do with other.
2006-12-21 17:14:52 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
That's probably pretty close to the truth. The Bush administration's case for the Iraq invasion was based pre-emptive action against what Iraq might have, what they might do with what they might have and who might be in Iraq to do what they might do.
If you don't believe it Google up my sources.
2006-12-21 17:10:04 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Brilliant!
2006-12-21 16:59:41 · answer #6 · answered by Bobby W 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why even try to put "George W. Bush" and "logic" in the same sentence?
2006-12-21 17:07:51 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
That's why GW said God told him to do it.
2006-12-21 16:57:19 · answer #8 · answered by Atlas 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
It does not matter to me whether there was or was not
Saddam needed to come out of power
Just as Hitler did
2006-12-21 16:57:53 · answer #9 · answered by snuggels102 6 · 0⤊ 3⤋
Good try....no prize
2006-12-21 17:16:43 · answer #10 · answered by ? 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋