I HAVE NO DESIRE TO DO ANY OF THESE THINGS....
But, having made that clear, I'd like to know the origins of these procedures and how they're done today. Any history on them?
I've heard that tails are done without any anesthesia, in other words, the puppie's tail is simply cut off. Is that really how it goes?
And so that no one brings up the common myth, docking and clipping did not have ANYTHING to do with FIGHTING dogs. Dog fighting is a newer *though barbaric* practice than the altering of a dog's appearance, and I don't think that either procedure was originally done as "breed standard" because they go back to a time when dogs were useful *before dogs were pets, when they were mostly used for hunting and hearding and such* vs. standards don't quite stretch that far back.
I'M NOT TAKING ANY SIDE, DO IT IF YOU WANT, DON'T DO IT IF YOU WANT. I WON'T SAY THAT I DON'T CARE, BUT I WON'T SAY MY POV FOR FEAR OF BEING KNOCKED FOR MY OPINION.
Thank you.
2006-12-21
06:46:25
·
8 answers
·
asked by
mandy
3
in
Pets
➔ Dogs
Wow... didn't even share my opinion and got knocked for it... that's pathetic, Tyke. Now you don't even wait for someone to say the wrong thing, all they have to do is think it.
As for anesthesia, I think the term I meant was local anesthetic, not the one that puts the animal to sleep just the one that numbs the area. Like when you step on a tooth pick, they pump your foot full of numbing stuff and then pull it out. If it's poison to kill pain, then doctor hook me up cuz I dun like to hurt.
If you beleive in plastic surgery for dogs, so be it. If you don't, that's fine. I never said weather I thought it was right or wrong, I think all I said was about dog fighting, which has to be illegal for a reason, right? Apparently I'm not the only one that thinks it's wrong to sick one dog on another, and haven't I read storries of Tyke herself breaking up a dog fight? Oh I do beleive I have.
2006-12-21
09:33:49 ·
update #1