If Creationism is true where is the proof of that creation?

Question

Any fossils, any actual physical proof?

And please, I'm not talking about writings in the bible.

I am actually trying to be open here.

Ok, clarification, human creation, forget the stars and the sun, how about human life on earth.

Answer 1

There isn't any. There are a number of outright false claims made by Creationist groups, but all have been long-debunked and revealed as false. The only thing Creationists have besides the claims of their book are semantics games.

Answer 2

The proof is all around you. It's self evident.

You didn't ask WHERE IS THE PROOF OF THE CREATOR.

God left no footprints, other than our DNA and some writings in a book about a legacy.

If things are RANDOM then, theoretically speaking, there should be ways of making things other than by atomic bonding.

Randomness should create in random ways. Not just with electron building and bonding.

There is enough anti matter in the universe to create anti creatings, but there isn't any evidence of this.

Things go together in an orderly fashion according to rules.

The Heisenberg uncertainty principal says there are no hard and fast rules. Everything is uncertain. Random. Unpredicatble to a degree.

It gets back to my box of parts from Radio Shack. You can't shake them for a trillion years and expect to get a full functioning X Box.

An X Box requires a creator.

You can't put U-235 into a box, shake it and get a RANDOM atomic explosion. It just doesn't happen.

If rocks in space come together and bond because of gravity you would not get a sphere until there was so much mass that the crust would fall and fill in the gaps and at that point it becomes doubtful if a fraile ant or human could survive on that surface.

To have enough MASS to crumble rock. To crumble granite and make it fall to the surface and become UNIFORM would exceed the graivity limits for human life on the surface.

If Nature formed planets randomly from space debris they'd look random, like an asteroid.

OK

Let's look at the process.

The current KNOWN universe if 14 billion light-year miles miles in diameter.

Light travels 550,000,000 miles in a single year. 14,000,000,000 of these years is a very large distance.

When the END of things comes it will be even further if Carl Sagan is correct in his Cosmic Calendar.

Now, all the burnt out matter in the universe eventually over billions of trillions of years amasses into a huge gravity well that sucks in light and crumbles it's crust and warps space and time and contracts the universe into a small region until critical mass is formed and then it exploses in a Big Bang and RANDOMLY creates a matrix that eventually produces inorganic chemicals that randomly form into organic life on a planet called Earth that randomly develop in you. And you eventually become self aware and know the reflection in the mirror is you and not a rival animal.

And all of this, according to the Heisenberg theory, is not only RANDOM, but CHANCE and subjec to NOT HAPPENING A SECOND TIME.

Given the SAME set of circusmtances, according to Heisenberg, there are STRONG ODDS life would NOT FORM on the Earth a second time.

This is the current scientific theory as to how got here. We were a Lucky 7 shot by the Cosmic Casino. Heisenberg says the Odds of getting a 7 the next throw are not very favorable.

And Religious people talk nonsense and fairy tales!

Answer 3

The argument goes something like this:

An intelligent creator created all of the complexity that we see today because complexity requires intelligence to create it.

The problem with this opinion is that it immediately creates an impossibility. If complexity cannot arise without intelligence, then we immediately must ask, "Who created the intelligent creator?" The creator could not spring into existence if complexity requires intelligence. Therefore, God is impossible.

Answer 4

I think the fact that humans seem to have existed without this "missing link". I have yet to hear of cave paintings that show a group of humans swinging from trees with bows and arrows and a tail. If we evolved from monkeys, or were so closely related to monkeys as I've heard it said, then there will be some kind of in between stage, and that has never been proven.

Answer 5

If you really expect me to believe that the coordination of the world, the complexity of science, the beauty of nature, all just "happened" and that we all came from one single cell, then you are seriously insulting my intelligence. I don't understand why people think it's such a complicated evolutionary thing that happened; its very simple, the God of the universe, the One and Only, Created everything, and we aren't supposed to understand everything, and know why everything is the way it is, life is about so many more important things, then learning science and math and blah blah blah....Why do you think God created us and told us NOT to eat of the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil? He created us to only care about the important things in life...Living for Him, with Him, working the land, and enjoying life. Since we sinned, we have become so preoccupied on trying to know as much as God, that we have lost sight of the importance of life.

Answer 6

There simply isn't enough time or space to write everything. Read "The Signature of God" by Grant Jeffrey and I believe you will be amazed. Peace :-)

Answer 7

Would you consider the sun, the moon and the stars?
Would you consider lakes, mountains and forests?
Would you consider elephants and mice?
Would you consider the planet you're standing on?

Answer 8

You are asking for a lifetime of study in a one paragraph answer. In a word, Yes.

Answer 9

That would be us. We are proof of the creation. Your puny scientific mind couldn't possibly comprehend mankind just appearing. Think outside the box man!

Answer 10

look outside your window.