English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Obviously, he was a powerful and influential christian leader that stood as representative for evangelical christians across America.
Do you think he did more harm than good?

2006-12-21 04:22:49 · 7 answers · asked by Samurai Jack 6 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

7 answers

What good are you talking about? Brainwashing a third of America to chant away in a frenzy, act like nuts and vote for Bush?

2006-12-21 04:25:19 · answer #1 · answered by tammers 3 · 0 0

Harm

2006-12-21 12:35:28 · answer #2 · answered by Uncle Thesis 7 · 0 0

Yes I think he did much more harm than good. He damaged the preachers out there that aren't worth millions and have thousands of followers. Not everyone in the christian community is like him.

2006-12-21 12:25:35 · answer #3 · answered by Monte T 6 · 1 0

MUCH MORE HARM-Wasn't he the closeted homosexual that was the most anti-gay evangelical?And drug user?

2006-12-21 12:28:10 · answer #4 · answered by Art 4 · 1 0

No. I believe that it just goes to show that nothing will be hidden when it comes down to it.

2006-12-21 13:44:16 · answer #5 · answered by j_d_barrow 3 · 0 0

harm

2006-12-21 12:24:45 · answer #6 · answered by Jesus junkie 3 · 0 0

who was that???

2006-12-21 12:24:58 · answer #7 · answered by Truth bearer 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers