2006-12-21 02:05:47 · 13 answers · asked by dfbd d 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
They are not sure.
But we are all sure they found the oil pipelines and made a few more of their own.
The whole world knows that Iraq was a huge fiasco to get control of the mid-easts oil.
And why would they want to find any anyway??? Then they would have no reason to actually be there to steal the oil.
The same reason they "can't"...or won't find Osama in Afghanistan, then they would have to leave.
No, they will soak absolutely every last oil drop and every last resource at the cost of not only the people that live there but at the cost of their own soldiers.
Ahhh- to be exploited like the Americans that actually believe in their government...
Just like Actor Sean Penn said recently in a major speech: "If we tried to impeach one president for oral sex, shouldn't we impeach this administration for outright lying?"
Now - Cue all the pro-americans out there to give my answer a bad rating.
PS - To the guy that said that 'Saddam had used them" - he was right, but "USED" does not mean have.
PPS - And...to those who have said the Iraq had all the parts to make dirty bombs...SO WHAT! Does that justify the destruction of the country that we have witnessed over the past few years??? Canada probably could make dirty bombs!! Should the US attack them next???
2006-12-21 02:16:35 · answer #1 · answered by I'm Superior In Every Way 2 · 0⤊ 3⤋
Their were none the truly faithful conservative sheep will say with a straight face mind you that Saddam smuggled them into Syria right under the most intensely watched border in the world for 10 years running. All such weapons and programs were destroyed in 1991. The faithful will point to a few battlefield left overs as proof. The only thing that proved was how bad Iraqi inventory control was. As the whole lot will fit on one pallet and this was found scattered all over Iraq. In short rounds that were left on one battlefield or another or blown clear of a ammo dump from the 1st Iraq war.
2006-12-21 04:32:30 · answer #2 · answered by brian L 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Iraq under Saddam was the perfect Middle East version of Nazism of Hitler. If Bush had not gone to Iraq, Iraq would have come to Europe and USA. The backbone of the Baath Party ideology is centered on "anti-Israel, USA and Europe.
The different between Saddam Hussein and Usama bin Laden is their disagreement on the best ideology,which should be used to rally the Middle East against Western Civilization. Saddam prefers Arab nationalism whereas Bin Laden raises the banner of Islamic fundamentalism. Both are weapons of Mass Destruction
2006-12-21 02:57:44 · answer #3 · answered by S. A 1 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Safely in the custody of the U.S. Armed Forces for now, thank you very much. Believe the Clinton News Network or the Communist Broadcasting Service if you like, but I'll take the words of my colleagues in uniform who have actually BEEN to Iraq and have actually SEEN the weapons of mass destruction WITH THEIR OWN EYES over the postulations of some idiot spin-doctor who has never set foot in Iraq and has no desire to pass on the truth to the American public because it doesn't fit into his anti-war Bush-bashing agenda.
2006-12-21 02:15:52 · answer #4 · answered by sarge927 7 · 5⤊ 1⤋
I have seen the mustard and the sarin cannisters there, and not to mention the bio-warfare lab that was found. I think the media decided to take it upon themselves to redifine what WMD means, and thought that it is only a nuclear device. There is no doubt that some fissile material has made its way to Iran and Syria, which is very scary indeed. Iraqi's never had a program that could put togeter a viable nuclear device, however, dirty bombs were well with in there reach with the fissile material that they had obtained.
2006-12-21 02:38:30 · answer #5 · answered by Shawn M 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
In the weapons of mass destruction factory
2006-12-21 02:14:25 · answer #6 · answered by jo jo 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Does not exist.
Just blunders and slip-ups with human errors on misinterpretation, miscommunication, communication failures with communication break-down.
The real one were those Aliens expose in Peter Arnett's documentary with the national geographic in planet of apes.
Expose in the missing x-files too.
On" there's no where can living human kind can hide " away from it.
The reality and horrors of "War of the world" that became a nightmares expose by HG Wells in planet of apes.
The misery that got living human kind all at loss and blurr on what went wrong after the war was over in planet of apes.
2006-12-21 02:28:39 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 4⤋
Syria. They transported them there while the UN held the US back for months before the war.
2006-12-21 02:15:55 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Never heard of any countries telling the specific locations for those kinds of stuff.
They always keep it a secret.
2006-12-21 02:26:14 · answer #9 · answered by cruel 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Where indeed. I am curious where Saddam sent them.
Oh. You were implying that Iraq didn't have them and thus our reasons for invading are invalid.
But haven't you seen Saddam's trial? He used them to kill thousands of Kurds.
2006-12-21 02:15:52 · answer #10 · answered by Time to Shrug, Atlas 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋