On September 11th 2001, shortly after planes took down World Trade Center Towers 1 and 2, tower 7 collapsed to the ground. A special point is that building 7 stood across the Trade Center compound, not right next to towers 1 and 2. The footage was shown on tv for one day and then never shown again on air. There is something very suspicious as to why the media was not allowed to continue airing the "demolition" of WTC 7. When compared to classic demolotions side by side, it definately fit the earmarks of controlled demolitions. The official story released was due to small fires several gas tanks exploded bringing the building down. But why dont many people know about this? Besides the fact that gas canisters wernt allowed in the WTC buildings and that WTC 7 was evacuated prior to any fires starting, the governments story must be true right? The owner of the WTC buildings Larry Silverstein said on a PBS program he made the decision to "pull" the building. He later changed his story.
2006-12-20 23:41:52 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Media & Journalism
rubbish
2006-12-21 00:57:28 · answer #1 · answered by traveller 7 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Well, if it is true that it was structurally damaged by the blasts from the Twin Towers and was evacuated, then it's not surprising there has been little mention of number seven when one and two, with the tragic loss of hundreds of lives, would take the bulk of the media attention. So I suppose it was a controlled demolition, and not a direct result of the attack on the Twin Towers.
I doubt that it was about the media not being "allowed" to talk about it, but that they didn't bother, once having reported it, because there was no more news in it. Sad but true, loss of life is what made the attention on the Twin Towers so intense.
2006-12-20 23:54:05 · answer #2 · answered by auntb93again 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Why don't you just give it up? It really happened. To me, it just shows what a really determined person with a good education can do. Mr. Atta was a well educated architect who had been targeting the WTC for years. It was a very carefully studied and executed attack by a man who not only hated the USA but hated the entire concept of high rise buildings which he saw as the ruin of Egyptian culture. No one ever claimed that small gas can exploded incidentally, they only claimed the jet fuel tank exploded.
2006-12-20 23:50:50 · answer #3 · answered by Huey from Ohio 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
glenn beck or loose change ring a bell? you're either the same idiot who keeps posting the same thing on here over and over and over again or one of his co-horts....how about the destruction of the twin towers being foretold by the guy who designed the twenty dollar bill...fold it right and you can see the twin towers on fire ! oh maybe if you fold it again you can see building 7 on it....bottom line you are spending way too much time on something that doesn't matter at this point.....do something positive with your life...get educated.
2006-12-20 23:54:57 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
maybe the intended building was number seven, and the owner may have known this but the other two got in the way, in my own logical thinking after you brought this detail up, it could appear that the message was in deed for number seven.
2006-12-21 00:50:19 · answer #5 · answered by Conway 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
We know. What are we going to do? revolt? we'll probably get our butts kick, the gov't got all types of neat weapons. We should probably just go to work everyday and obey and hope they don't kill all o f us
2006-12-20 23:46:22 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
when the towers fell they took number 7 world trade with them.
2006-12-20 23:59:01 · answer #7 · answered by scooprandell 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
No wonder the citizens of this country are so controllable, they believe everything the government tells them.
2006-12-21 06:01:39 · answer #8 · answered by firewomen 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
You underestimate what we know. Most of us do not believe the conspiracy theory. Why would America attack itself? If I hear one more person say its so we could control the oil, I ask you......if we have so much control over Mideast oil, why are we paying so much money for it?
2006-12-20 23:56:55 · answer #9 · answered by Firespider 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I read that it was structurally damaged by the other blasts and had to be brought down for safety reasons.
2006-12-20 23:44:15 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
i guess its because all the focus was on the twin towers and how tragic it was ..
:(
2006-12-20 23:44:37 · answer #11 · answered by DeeDee 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋