2006-12-20 22:24:18 · 11 answers · asked by wwwwwwwfe 1 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
s.crew y.ou, this isn't a hard question. I don't really want to be vulgar but this is the 10th time you posted this crap, this can be solved using basic conservation of momentum laws only if you gave us the velocity and mass of the objects prior to collision or sometime between and time intervals, then I could tell you the direction the objects would be headed as well as angle if you gave data, but no you just keep it a mystery to make the question seem something it is not, this is basic high school physics, it isn't even thought worthy. There is no two unstoppable objects in this mechanical universe, all atoms and objects made by atoms depend upon energy to commit work, and if they have energy they have defined characteristics such as velocity and mass from which we can determine the conclusion of a collision.
2006-12-20 22:42:42 · answer #1 · answered by Zidane 3 · 3⤊ 0⤋
That's easy, Mr Smarty Pants. There is no answer because you have left out soooooo much data. 1) Relative size 2) Relative speeds 3) Relative masses and densities 4) Relative hardness and cohesion (structure) of each object 5) Shapes, is one sharp and one flat surfaced You want everyone to think you're soooooo smart because you've asked a question you say they can't answer correctly. Well Mr Genius, even Albert Einstein couldn't answer this question with the data supplied. So, please, go away, stop asking, and try convince some other group of people how smart you are! Okay my question are irrelevant, so I may answer them anyway I like. 1) 1 is the size of the sun, and 1 the size of a grain of sand. 2) The "sun" is moving at the speed of light, the sand at 1mm per millenium. 3) The "sun" has the mass and relative density of a black hole, the sand is gaseous and has un registerable density, it is that light it can't be measured. 4) The "sun" has a hardness rating of 100 on the Moh's scale (diamonds are hardest at ~10), the sand has a hardness rating of 0.0000001 5) Now totally irrelevant given 1 to 4 above. Result of the collision of these 2 objects? The "sun" continues on at the speed of light, the "sand", given the density of the "sun" would theoretically cease to exist, but actually would now just be an infinitesimal small part of the "sun". Or you do you live in comic book land? If they both continued on, unaffected, it means they have passed through each other. If they pass through each other they have actually not collided! So what you are saying is that you should have asked this in the philosophy section instead of the science section. There is no answer except for the one you want, or hypothesise is the right one. It would be like me asking you to give me an answer to this question: solve for y, giving a finite number as your answer, when y = 1/x and x = 0. You are a fanciful d!ckhead, who has delusions of higher intelligence. Anyone can ask an impossible question with no parameters, and then tell everyone they're wrong, because the question has no answer. Stick to philosophy and give the science a miss, junior, 'cause you obviously know more about comic books than you do science!
2016-05-23 04:29:15 · answer #2 · answered by Ivette 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It depends on the object, a little of the kinetic energy will be transferred and each object will rebound, chances are they will be badly damaged if not destroyed.
Steel balls of the same size and density will rebound to a similar distance.
2006-12-20 22:34:57 · answer #3 · answered by Bladerunner (Dave) 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There cannot be TWO unstoppable objects.
2006-12-20 23:28:21 · answer #4 · answered by anthonypaullloyd 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
They would react with one another? You didn't exactly state *what* two objects would be colliding. Cars crashing, my hands clapping, fingers fapping, guitars strumming, baseballs flying off bats. What are you referring too?
2006-12-20 22:26:44 · answer #5 · answered by Hotwad 980 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Accident
2006-12-20 22:29:17 · answer #6 · answered by ak 123 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The release of infinite energy....almost like the collision of a nuetron with unstable uranium isotopes.....
2006-12-21 08:44:36 · answer #7 · answered by Its not me Its u 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Good question. Either:
1) They would stop and it would be of no general import
2) Upon contact, the Universe as we know it would cease to exist
2006-12-20 22:27:04 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
thats impossible....the reason the object is moving is the same reason it can also be stopped.
2006-12-20 22:36:50 · answer #9 · answered by Spiderpig 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If they were truly unstoppable then the two juggernauts would just deflect off one another and keep on going. (They are unstoppable, DUH!) Sincerly,
MDP
2006-12-20 22:37:24 · answer #10 · answered by Mervin DePervin 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋