2006-12-20 18:26:45 · 5 answers · asked by Sumaiya T 1 in Sports ➔ Cricket
no he's not
because hes not that consistent in his batting
may be cauz of his injuries or fitness
u just cannot judge people by their few good perfomances u have 2 c them performing well at all times or when the team requires a good innings from u .
he can become 1 of the greatest but till now hes not
2006-12-20 18:41:34 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
While Ramnaresh Sarwan is a good batsman, he cannot be termed as greatest batsman in the World as he is not at all consistent and have not set any batting record of his own.
2006-12-21 05:33:00 · answer #2 · answered by vakayil k 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Are you crazy???
You cannot compare Sarwan to the likes of:
Lara, Tendulkar, Ponting, Dravid, Kallis, Hussey, etc. This is only in the current era. What about Bradman, Greame Pollock, Richards, Gavaskar in the previous era??
I am sorry. To be considered great you really have to be. Sarwan is too inconsistent and is not really in that class.
2006-12-21 03:50:02 · answer #3 · answered by Altus D 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No! i dont think so.
2006-12-23 11:22:07 · answer #4 · answered by Jaff 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no
2006-12-22 01:51:17 · answer #5 · answered by john 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋