Hillary clinton will no doubt run for president- and if she won, it would be a disaster- not just becuse her politics are dispicable- but becuse women lack the intelligence and ability to hold the position of president. Most women have the emotional stability and intelligence of children. 'Intelligent' women are simply mimicing men. They should be at home baking cookies and rearing children. Can't a law be passed to make sure only men can be president?
2006-12-20 18:02:59 · 32 answers · asked by OctopusGuy 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
Yes.
God help this nation.
look what happened to the Phillipines.
Rofl
2006-12-20 18:05:06 · answer #1 · answered by JtoJ 4 · 2⤊ 7⤋
As being a woman myself and with this election in 2008 and Hillary Clinton running for president I think women should be barred until Hillary is no longer in the picture because she would be just like Bush but hopefully oneday Nancy Pelosi will run for president..and I think women are far more intelligent then men and there shouldn't be a law for only men to be president cause that would take away our rights as women...why does every man think that a woman is only here on this earth to make babies and bake cookies...
2006-12-20 21:18:58 · answer #2 · answered by Riley S 2 · 0⤊ 3⤋
Too late for that. That kind of thinking started to die in 1920 when we gave women the right to vote. Since then, we have had a number of successful women Govenors, women Senators, women Congressman and even women Supreme Court Justices. Are you telling me they all were to fragile to handle the job? Ann Richards must be spinning in her grave or laughing at your stupidity.
Even if you can get a Constitutional Ammendment passed to restrict those running for president to only be males, there would be obvious loopholes. For starters, what would the rules be for those who had sex change operations that wanted to run? What happens if the president or vice-president dies or resigns and there is a woman holding the office that would become vice-president under those conditions?
Face it, you can't win. Women outnumber the men in this country by a slight margin. You might be able to stay alert and awake 24/7, but I need my rest. Best to let them be happy.
2006-12-20 18:24:06 · answer #3 · answered by Kevin k 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Why ?
Women are just as capable as men. There is no reason other than prejudice to try and stop a woman being President.
And just because Clinton might be a disaster that should not be used to prevent equality.
One of the greatest leaders my country ever had was Mrs Thatcher.
Election should be based an ability not bigotry.
2006-12-20 22:03:27 · answer #4 · answered by Ak23566 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Some women are alot stronger emotionally then some men I know.Men ruled so far & look where its gotten us. (sorry guys).
Its wrong to say that either women or men are more intelligent than the other.And exactly what man is it that I am mimicing???lol.Im in my drivers seat,,that way Im never taken for a ride.
I have to add ,,there are some really intelligent men on this site,,& then there are some that are not.
2006-12-20 18:08:24 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
I'd have no problem with a woman being President, but I would have a problem with Hillary. I'm not worried though because she is not nearly popular enough to pull it off. I think that Oprah would have a better chance at getting elected. Not that I like her either, but she isn't nearly as polarizing. She's just a hypocrite. Hillary is a liar.
2006-12-21 01:39:29 · answer #6 · answered by DA 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Any woman would do a better job than the retarded monkey in there now!!!!
How insane are you to want to ban female presidents? Women are more than able to run a country. We are just as intelligent as men and should not be limited to "baking cookies and rearing children."
2006-12-20 18:06:42 · answer #7 · answered by ~ Amanda ~ 3 · 5⤊ 2⤋
Its a great pity you didn't use care in what your trying to say.I being a woman agree only in part!Today, our world could not deal, with a woman President.
Your correct in saying Hillary maybe would make it a disaster.
I believe there is room for woman...in all things of life.
Except the most powerful person,in the world.
That I have to say....not today, not ever...............'why'
Because GOD has made man the one to rule over,all.CHRIST himself is male....so I have to say no to being a woman president.
As far as your statement...it be-littles women, but then again...this world has plenty of arrogant men.!!!......your one.Plus, you are unable to convince anyone, with your attitude.
I have always, had the above opinion....but at 52 I believe I am a wise woman.
May be one day, with enough education...you may be able to post your view far better than you have on here.
One can ONLY hope!
2006-12-20 18:10:49 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
How the hell would you know what it takes to be president? I sure as hell don't see you up there.
I'm pretty sure that's because you "lack the intelligence and ability to hold the position of president."
2006-12-20 20:54:04 · answer #9 · answered by stelle d. 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
No. Though I can't stand Hitlery Clinton, I disagree with you. Some women are capable of leadership. I'll admit that the majority of women aren't capable of leading the United States, but come on--please don't compare every woman in the world to Hitlery!
2006-12-21 00:20:39 · answer #10 · answered by ♥honey♥ 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋
I suppose Margaret Thatcher was emotionally unstable and changing her mind? Or unintelligent? Or not decisive enough? I am not a fan of Thatcher, but for the opposite reasons, not for lack of stability.
2006-12-20 18:13:42 · answer #11 · answered by cpinatsi 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋