All the Jews would say Hitler.
All the New Yorkers would say Bin Laden.
All the Chinese will say the Japanese.
WHO CARES?
2006-12-20 17:58:04
·
answer #1
·
answered by JtoJ 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
If it's a question of body count then Hitler is more evil but Bush is ahead of bin Laden
2006-12-21 02:09:32
·
answer #2
·
answered by brainstorm 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
osama bin laden
2006-12-21 02:05:38
·
answer #3
·
answered by AMIT G 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
We already know what Hitler was capable of. Osama ? Only time will tell.
2006-12-22 06:32:35
·
answer #4
·
answered by susan 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
For all the World is Hitler for all Americans is Osama
Definitely not Stalin
2006-12-21 06:06:50
·
answer #5
·
answered by Dionisis T 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I would say Hitler overall. He had a strong desire to target jews. eveyone else just got in his way on the world dominance goal. Just curious to see what would have eventuall happened to japan and Italy if the Germans would have won. Remember, Russia was an ally during world war II and when it was over, we started seriously looking at one another suspiciously.
Osama on the other hand is on a "religious" quest. i and lots of folks see it as evil, but in his warped view he is just. Evil has many faces. It's the priest molesting boys, or having preachers having flings destroying their church (lust).
2006-12-21 02:10:33
·
answer #6
·
answered by Curious 4
·
0⤊
2⤋
on the first day of school this year, my charcter was osama bin laden ( some teacher thign) and he still makes fun of me for it
ah
but at least devyns in that class
2006-12-21 01:57:50
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
HItler...they haven't really found or proven anything about Osama
2006-12-21 02:03:10
·
answer #8
·
answered by alwaysmoose 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
definitely osama
2006-12-21 01:58:46
·
answer #9
·
answered by sensi K 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
ask me it is george w. bush. he has killed so maney kids an women in iraq an afganistan.
2006-12-21 04:24:44
·
answer #10
·
answered by scooprandell 7
·
0⤊
0⤋