Do you think if the WWE were to be unscripted and have real fighting, TNA will have some competition? I think so.
2006-12-20 16:15:16 · 18 answers · asked by ? 2 in Sports ➔ Wrestling
I like WWE better than TNA. I just wanna know the opinions of the TNA Lover/WWE haters think.
2006-12-21 16:24:34 · update #1
Mr Kevin, i am a WWE fan,but i wont argue with you.
Please give me best answer plizzzzzzzzzzz:-)
2006-12-20 19:37:10 · answer #1 · answered by The Rock 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Look, if you give me a thumbs down your just sad, This is an honest opinion.
Tna is where wrestlers go if they get kicked out the WWE. WWE is where TNA wrestlers make their name then go to TNA, thus making TNA have instant stars. It is very clevel when you think about it.
Tna has better talent than WWE, overall. But TNA is still the foster home for washed up WWE wrestlers. http://www.wwe.com is the official wwe website. http://www.tnawrestling.com is the official tna website.
Check those 2 out. It will help you make up your mind what one is better.
2006-12-22 10:33:16 · answer #2 · answered by woodythestick 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
If WWE was unscripted TNA would go out of business. Cuz' even though wwe is scripted it still kicks TNA's A**.
2006-12-24 17:36:20 · answer #3 · answered by KISS Fan 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
According to what I see above...everyone except TNA fans have clicked your question...which just shows that there're so many more WWE fans out there. Yes, TNA have talented (hahaha) wrestlers, they have Kurt Angle, they have Sting....
...but think about it and you'll see that TNA's biggest stars are people who couldnt make it in WWE. Jeff Jarett had his @$$ handed to him by Chyna. The Truth never made it happen in WWE. Rhyno never made it, and neither did Christian. Kurt Angle is TNA's biggest star...and that's because WWE made him who he is today. Nobody would hire some guy who won a gold medal in 1996. TNA hired him because he's WWE's Kurt Angle.
Oh and yes, BG James and Kip James had their chances in WWE and would be with DX right now if they hadnt made complete idiots of themselves while they were in WWE.
2006-12-21 01:22:50 · answer #4 · answered by Rockafella 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
TNA have real competition???????? 1st of all, ECW gets better rating that TNA, so does smackdown. and those are the B and C teams of WWE. Raw gets huge worldwide viewers, and they sell out arena's all over the world. TNA sells out a small building at universal studios. Real competition????
2006-12-21 01:03:25 · answer #5 · answered by Hafeman 5000 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
That depends on how many more wrestlers and not "superstars" TNA can get. You gota remember though, TNA is scripted as well. They just pull off better moves in TNA than they do in WWE
2006-12-21 00:39:51 · answer #6 · answered by revman_237 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
How dare you compare WWE to TNA. TNA is nothing like WWE, WWE has BETTER wrestlers and more excitement than TNA.
2006-12-26 16:28:20 · answer #7 · answered by ♥Sammie♥ 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
TNA is already competition. WWE's ratings have gone down this month while TNA's ratings have hit a new high and keep on growing.
2006-12-21 00:37:14 · answer #8 · answered by MikeAwesome 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
maybe. and if wwe had better champions and pay per view matches on raw and smackdown then yes wwe would be a big threat to tna as a competition. but as far as right now wwe sucks. except smackdown. i mean no disrespect towards mcmahon but i know he can do a much much much better job with raw and then maybe i will watch raw more.
2006-12-20 18:21:02 · answer #9 · answered by mamas_grandmasboy06 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
i like TNA but the TNA always get some superstar from WWE so i like the WWE more than TNA soryy if i click this........
2006-12-20 20:29:36 · answer #10 · answered by ♪♫♪Music Lover♪♫♪ 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
wwe is just way better than tna
2006-12-24 18:21:55 · answer #11 · answered by curious 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋